New Ways to Evaluate Goodness of Fit: A Note on Using Equivalence Testing to Assess Structural Equation Models

被引:112
作者
Marcoulides, Katerina M. [1 ]
Yuan, Ke-Hai [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
CFI; equivalence testing; fit indexes; likelihood ratio statistic; RMSEA; INDEXES; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1080/10705511.2016.1225260
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Structural equation models are typically evaluated on the basis of goodness-of-fit indexes. Despite their popularity, agreeing what value these indexes should attain to confidently decide between the acceptance and rejection of a model has been greatly debated. A recently proposed approach by means of equivalence testing has been recommended as a superior way to evaluate the goodness of fit of models. The approach has also been proposed as providing a necessary vehicle that can be used to advance the inferential nature of structural equation modeling as a confirmatory tool. The purpose of this article is to introduce readers to key ideas in equivalence testing and illustrate its use for conducting model-data fit assessments. Two confirmatory factor analysis models in which a priori specified latent variable models with known structure and tested against data are used as examples. It is advocated that whenever the goodness of fit of a model is to be assessed researchers should always examine the resulting values obtained via the equivalence testing approach.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A different paradigm for the initial colonisation of Sahul [J].
Allen, Jim ;
O'Connell, James F. .
ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA, 2020, 55 (01) :1-14
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, A first course in structural equation modeling
[3]  
Arbuckle J.L., 2012, IBM SPSS Amos 21 user's guide
[4]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[5]  
Bentler P., 2006, EQS: Structural equations program manual
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[7]   OpenMx: An Open Source Extended Structural Equation Modeling Framework [J].
Boker, Steven ;
Neale, Michael ;
Maes, Hermine ;
Wilde, Michael ;
Spiegel, Michael ;
Brick, Timothy ;
Spies, Jeffrey ;
Estabrook, Ryne ;
Kenny, Sarah ;
Bates, Timothy ;
Mehta, Paras ;
Fox, John .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2011, 76 (02) :306-317
[8]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[9]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[10]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55