Reference value of perimeter-derived diameter assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in left atrial appendage occluder size selection

被引:4
|
作者
Kong, Dehong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Yingying [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Xiaochun [2 ]
Jin, Qinchun [2 ]
Dong, Lili [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou, Daxin [2 ]
Shu, Xianhong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Cuizhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Echocardiog, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Inst Cardiovasc Dis, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Med Imaging, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES | 2020年 / 37卷 / 11期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
left atrial appendage closure; three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography; transcatheter device; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CT ANGIOGRAPHY; CLOSURE; FIBRILLATION; STROKE; PREVENTION; WARFARIN; OUTCOMES; ANATOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/echo.14705
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of perimeter-derived diameter (PDD) measured by three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in predicting the size of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder. Methods and results Left atrial appendage landing zone diameter (LZD) was measured by two-dimensional (2D) TEE, 3DTEE, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD, LZD-DSAmax, respectively, before and during transcatheter LAA closure with Watchman devices in 100 patients. A difference of one or more device size intervals between the predicted size and the size actually implanted was defined as mismatching. Seventy-eight patients were followed up by TEE to obtain occluder compression ratio. The correlation between LZD and the final implanted occluder size was 0.559, 0.641, 0.754, 0.760, 0.782, and 0.848 for LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD and LZD-DSAmax, respectively (P < .001). Matching ratio between the size predicted by retrospective measurements of LZD and the device size actually implanted was 65%, 57%, 66%, 63%, 70%, and 83% for LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD and LZD-DSAmax, respectively. There was no significant difference in LZD value, matching ratio, and compression ratio between the patients with eccentric and noneccentric LAA landing zone (P > .05). Compression ratio of the mismatching subjects was higher than that in the matching subjects when evaluated by LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmean, and LZD-PDD (P < .05). Conclusions Landing zone diameter derived from LAA perimeter measured by preprocedure 3DTEE showed reference value for LAA occluder size selection, providing superior correlation and matching ratio with the final implanted size and indicating the adjustment of oversizing.
引用
收藏
页码:1828 / 1837
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Left Atrial Appendage Parameters Assessed by Real-Time Three Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography Predict Thromboembolic Risk in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation
    Chen, Zhongxiu
    Bai, Wenjuan
    Li, Chen
    Wang, Hui
    Tang, Hong
    Qin, Yupei
    Rao, Li
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2017, 36 (06) : 1119 - 1128
  • [42] Roles of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in peri-operation of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure
    Zhou, Qing
    Song, Hongning
    Zhang, Lan
    Deng, Qing
    Chen, Jinling
    Hu, Bo
    Wang, Yijia
    Guo, Ruiqiang
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (04)
  • [43] Assessment of the left atrial appendage structure and morphology: comparison of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography
    Wenjuan Bai
    Zhongxiu Chen
    Hong Tang
    Hui Wang
    Wei Cheng
    Li Rao
    The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2017, 33 : 623 - 633
  • [44] Left Atrial Appendage Volume as a Predictor of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus and Sludge in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Study
    Harada, Kenji
    Tanaka, Jun
    Tolstrup, Kirsten
    Gurudevan, Swaminatha V.
    Siegel, Robert J.
    Shiota, Takahiro
    CIRCULATION, 2012, 126 (21)
  • [45] Improved Algorithm for Ostium Size Assessment in Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
    Schmidt-Salzmann, Maximilian
    Meincke, Felix
    Kreidel, Felix
    Spangenberg, Tobias
    Ghanem, Alexander
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Bergmann, Martin W.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (07): : 232 - 238
  • [46] Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography to Facilitate Transseptal Puncture and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion via Upper Extremity Venous Access
    Aizer, Anthony
    Young, Wilson
    Saric, Muhamed
    Holmes, Douglas
    Fowler, Steven
    Chinitz, Larry
    CIRCULATION-ARRHYTHMIA AND ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 8 (04): : 988 - 990
  • [47] Assessment of the left atrial appendage structure and morphology: comparison of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomography
    Bai, Wenjuan
    Chen, Zhongxiu
    Tang, Hong
    Wang, Hui
    Cheng, Wei
    Rao, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 33 (05): : 623 - 633
  • [48] Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography demonstration of left atrial appendage echocontrast regression after 6 months therapy with dabigatran and not with warfarin
    Vestito, Domenico
    Desantis, Delia
    Colonna, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ECHOGRAPHY, 2016, 26 (02) : 52 - 55
  • [49] Volumetry of the left atrial appendage in healthy cats by two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography
    Rauch, J.
    Fehr, M.
    Beyerbach, M.
    Hungerbuehler, S. O.
    WIENER TIERARZTLICHE MONATSSCHRIFT, 2021, 108 (5-6): : 131 - 143
  • [50] Assessment of the left atrial appendage structure and function of the non-valvular atrial fibrillation by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
    Chen, Zhongxiu
    Bai, Wenjuan
    Wang, Hui
    Li, Chen
    Cheng, Wei
    Tang, Hong
    Rao, Li
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 66 (16) : C189 - C190