Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants

被引:0
|
作者
Yoon, Hyungjoon [1 ]
Park, Jaedeuk [1 ]
Lim, Wonsub [1 ]
Lee, Kwanghee [1 ]
Choi, Nakki
Lee, Chuljae
Moon, Il [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Seoul 120749, South Korea
关键词
Integrated Risk Assessment; Quantitative and Qualitative Methods; Potential Hazards; Annum Risk Contour; CHEMICAL-PROCESS DESIGN; HAZARDS;
D O I
10.1007/s11814-013-0057-0
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
This paper focuses on the development of an integrated risk assessment system to increase the safety of gas refinery plants. This integration is important in managing the design and the operation. of chemical plants and it requires significant time, effort and specialized expertise. We propose a systematic procedure to apply quantitative and qualitative hazard identification methods before constructing the refinery plants. Advantages of this assessment procedure are 1) systematic method in identifying most of the important hazards, 2) complete and rigorous analysis, and 3) reducing budget and time. The qualitative and quantitative assessment method consists of two and three steps, respectively. After these five steps, the risk of the same plant was calculated and analyzed. This method can identify risk and potential hazards from local gas refinery plants effectively and systematically. We applied the integrated qualitative and quantitative risk assessment method to remove the risk of a local gas refinery plant with 160 P&ID sheets. The result of this work confirmed that no residential population existed within the bounds of the 1 x 10(-6) per annum risk contour. Therefore, the risk to the public from the gas refinery plants should be considered acceptable.
引用
收藏
页码:1368 / 1374
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants
    Hyungjoon Yoon
    Jaedeuk Park
    Wonsub Lim
    Kwanghee Lee
    Nakki Choi
    Chuljae Lee
    Il Moon
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2013, 30 : 1368 - 1374
  • [2] Development of qualitative and quantitative AOPs and their integration into risk assessment
    Bois, F. Y.
    Gao, W.
    Yang, H.
    Carta, G.
    van der Stel, W.
    Delp, J.
    Gayraud, G.
    Beltman, J. B.
    Jennings, P.
    Leist, M.
    van de Water, B.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S22 - S22
  • [3] Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network
    Han, Z. Y.
    Weng, W. G.
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 189 (1-2) : 509 - 518
  • [4] Quantitative risk assessment improves refinery safety
    Markowski, AS
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2002, 100 (37) : 56 - 63
  • [5] Qualitative and quantitative risk assessment
    Coleman, ME
    Marks, HM
    FOOD CONTROL, 1999, 10 (4-5) : 289 - 297
  • [6] IT Risk Assessment: Quantitative and Qualitative Approach
    Rot, Artur
    WCECS 2008: WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2008, : 1073 - 1078
  • [7] Qualitative versus quantitative risk assessment
    Ye, F.
    RISK, RELIABILITY AND SAFETY: INNOVATING THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 874 - 880
  • [8] INTEGRATION ISSUES OF QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH
    Nosulenko, Valery N.
    EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2021, 14 (03): : 4 - 16
  • [9] Integration of qualitative and quantitative methods for fault detection isolation
    Theilliol, D
    Sauter, D
    Valdes, LGV
    (SAFEPROCESS'97): FAULT DETECTION, SUPERVISION AND SAFETY FOR TECHNICAL PROCESSES 1997, VOLS 1-3, 1998, : 675 - 680
  • [10] The quantitative assessment of the benefits of physiological integration in clonal plants
    Chesson, P
    Peterson, AG
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2002, 4 (08) : 1153 - 1176