共 50 条
Development of Quality Indicators to Address Abuse and Neglect in Home-Based Primary Care and Palliative Care
被引:8
|作者:
Sheehan, Orla C.
[1
]
Ritchie, Christine S.
[2
]
Fathi, Roya
[2
,3
]
Garrigues, Sarah K.
[2
]
Saliba, Debra
[4
,5
,6
]
Leff, Bruce
[7
,8
,9
]
机构:
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Aging & Hlth, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Geriatr, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] San Francisco VA Med Ctr, Vet Affairs Qual Scholars Fellowship Program, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Jewish Home Borun Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Vet Affairs Geriatr Res, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Geriatr Med & Gerontol, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD USA
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Community & Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词:
abuse;
neglect;
quality indicators;
home-based primary care;
home-based palliative care;
ELDER ABUSE;
REPORTING MISTREATMENT;
PHYSICIANS;
SET;
STANDARDS;
D O I:
10.1111/jgs.14365
中图分类号:
R592 [老年病学];
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
100203 ;
摘要:
OBJECTIVES: To develop candidate quality indicators (QIs) for the quality standard of "addressing abuse and neglect" in the setting of home-based medical care. DESIGN: Systematic literature review of both the peer-reviewed and gray literature. SETTING: Home-based primary and palliative care practices. PARTICIPANTS: Homebound community-dwelling older adults. MEASUREMENTS: Articles were identified to inform the development of candidate indicators of the quality by which home-based primary and palliative care practices addressed abuse and neglect. The literature guided the development of patient-level QIs and practice-level quality standards. A technical expert panel (TEP) representing exemplary home-based primary care and palliative care providers then participated in a modified Delphi process to assess the validity and feasibility of each measure and identify candidate QIs suitable for testing in the field. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 4,371 titles and abstracts that were reviewed; 25 publications met final inclusion criteria and informed development of nine candidate QIs. The TEP rated all but one of the nine candidate indicators as having high validity and feasibility. CONCLUSION: Translating the complex problem of addressing abuse and neglect into QIs may ultimately serve to improve care delivered to vulnerable home-limited adults who receive home-based medical care.
引用
收藏
页码:2577 / 2584
页数:8
相关论文