Progestin-only and combined oral contraceptives and receptor-defined premenopausal breast cancer risk: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study

被引:26
|
作者
Busund, Marit [1 ]
Bugge, Nora S. [1 ]
Braaten, Tonje [1 ]
Waaseth, Marit [2 ]
Rylander, Charlotta [1 ]
Lund, Eiliv [1 ]
机构
[1] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Community Med, Pb 6070 Langnes, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[2] UiT Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Pharm, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast cancer subtypes; oral contraceptives; tumor heterogeneity; prospective cohort study; multiple imputation; REPRODUCTIVE FACTORS; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; SUBTYPES; AGE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; MENOPAUSE; VALIDITY; REGISTRY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.31266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer represent distinct cancer types and have differences in risk factors. Whether the two main hormonal forms of oral contraceptives (OCs); i.e. progestin-only (POC) and combined oral contraceptives (COC), are differentially associated with these subtypes are not well known. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of POC and COC use on hormone receptor-defined breast cancer risk in premenopausal women in a prospective population-based cohort - The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (NOWAC). Information on OC use was collected from 74,862 premenopausal women at baseline. Updated information was applied when follow-up information became available. Multiple imputation was performed to handle missing data, and multivariable Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for breast cancer. 1,245 incident invasive breast cancer cases occurred. POC use 5 years was associated with ER+ (HR=1.59, 95% CI 1.09- 2.32, p(trend)=0.03) and ER+/PR+ cancer (HR=1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.48, p(trend)=0.05), and was not associated with ER- (p(heterogeneity)=0.36) or ER-/PR- (p(heterogeneity)=0.49) cancer. COC use was associated with ER- and ER-/PR- cancer, but did not increase risk of ER+ and ER+/PR+ cancer. Current COC use gave different estimates for ER/PR-defined subtypes (p(heterogeneity)=0.04). This is the first study to show significant associations between POC use and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The lack of power to distinguish effects of POC use on subtype development calls for the need of larger studies to confirm our finding. What's new? Use of combined oral contraceptives (COC) is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and, predominantly, its hormone receptor-negative subtypes. Whether progestin-only contraceptives (POC) are also associated with elevated risk of receptor-defined subtypes of breast cancer is unknown. In this prospective, population-based study in Norway, POC use for five or more years was associated with estrogen receptor-positive and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive but not estrogen receptor-negative or estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer subtypes in premenopausal women. The associations contrast with those found for COC use, suggesting that estrogen and progestin serve dissimilar roles in subtype carcinogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:2293 / 2302
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Absence of an effect of injectable and implantable progestin-only contraceptives on subsequent risk of breast cancer
    Strom, BL
    Berlin, JA
    Weber, AL
    Norman, SA
    Bernstein, L
    Burkman, RT
    Daling, JR
    Deapen, D
    Folger, SG
    Malone, KE
    Marchbanks, PA
    Simon, MS
    Ursin, G
    Weiss, LK
    Spirtas, R
    CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (05) : 353 - 360
  • [2] Risk factors for hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in postmenopausal women
    Rosenberg, Lena U.
    Einarsdottir, Kristjana
    Friman, Erika Isaksson
    Wedren, Sara
    Dickman, Paul W.
    Hall, Per
    Magnusson, Cecilia
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (12) : 2482 - 2488
  • [3] ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES AND PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST CANCER
    Lund, Eiliv
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 69 (04) : 355 - 356
  • [4] Dietary carotenoids and risk of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in a prospective cohort of Swedish women
    Larsson, Susanna C.
    Bergkvist, Leif
    Wolk, Alicja
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (06) : 1079 - 1085
  • [5] User characteristics and out-of-pocket expenditures for progestin-only versus combined oral contraceptives
    Liang, Su-Ying
    Grossman, Daniel
    Phillips, Kathryn A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (06) : 666 - 672
  • [6] DURATION OF BREASTFEEDING IS SIMILAR IN POSTPARTUM WOMEN USING COMBINATION ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES COMPARED TO THOSE USING PROGESTIN-ONLY ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES
    Espey, E.
    Ogburn, T.
    Leeman, L.
    Montman, R.
    Ostrom, K.
    Schrader, R.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (02) : 208 - 208
  • [7] ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVES AND PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CANCER IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN
    STADEL, BV
    LAI, SH
    SCHLESSELMAN, JJ
    MURRAY, P
    CONTRACEPTION, 1988, 38 (03) : 287 - 299
  • [8] Interaction of dietary folate intake, alcohol, and risk of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women
    Sellers, TA
    Vierkant, RA
    Cerhan, JR
    Gapstur, SM
    Vachon, CM
    Olson, JE
    Pankratz, VS
    Kushi, LH
    Folsom, AR
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2002, 11 (10) : 1104 - 1107
  • [9] Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer in former users of oral contraceptives - The Norwegian women and cancer study
    Lund, Eiliv
    Bakken, Kjersti
    Dumeaux, Vanessa
    Andersen, Vegard
    Kumle, Merethe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 121 (03) : 645 - 648
  • [10] Oral contraceptives and risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of breast cancer
    Aslam, F
    Rashid, H
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (01): : 39 - 39