Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology

被引:1
|
作者
Yecies, Todd [1 ]
Averch, Timothy D. [1 ]
Semins, Michelle J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
radiation safety; ALARA; fluoroscopy; nephrolithiasis; REDUCES FLUOROSCOPY TIME; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; GUIDED URETEROSCOPY; DECISION-SUPPORT; CANCER-RISKS; FOLLOW-UP; DOSE CT; EXPOSURE; UROLITHIASIS; PATIENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The risks of exposure to medical ionizing radiation is of increasing concern both among medical professionals and the general public. Patients with nephrolithiasis are exposed to high levels of ionizing radiation through both diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Endourologists who perform a high-volume of fluoroscopy guided procedures are also exposed to significant quantities of ionizing radiation. The combination of judicious use of radiation-based imaging modalities, application of new imaging techniques such as ultra-low dose computed tomography (CT) scan, and modifying use of current technology such as increasing ultrasound and pulsed fluoroscopy utilization offers the possibility of significantly reducing radiation exposure. We present a review of the literature regarding the risks of medical ionizing radiation to patients and surgeons as it pertains to the field of endourology and interventions that can be performed to limit this exposure. Materials and methods: A review of the current state of the literature was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. Interventions designed to limit patient and surgeon radiation exposure were identified and analyzed. Summaries of the data were compiled and synthesized in the body of the text. Results: While no level1 evidence exists demonstrating the risk of secondary malignancy with radiation exposure, the preponderance of evidence suggests a dose and age dependent increase in malignancy risk from ionizing radiation. Patients with nephrolithiasis were exposed to an average effective dose of 37mSv over a 2 year period. Multiple evidence-based interventions to limit patient and surgeon radiation exposure and associated risk were identified. Conclusion: Current evidence suggest an age and dose dependent risk of secondary malignancy from ionizing radiation. Urologists must act in accordance with ALARA principles to safely manage nephrolithiasis while minimizing radiation exposure.
引用
收藏
页码:9154 / 9160
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ionizing radiation dose-effect indicator for cancer risks in medical radiation personnel
    Shahid, S.
    Masood, K.
    Riaz, M.
    Abubakar, S.
    Ali, S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S755 - S756
  • [2] Health risks of ionizing radiation
    Hempel, K
    Deubel, W
    Lorenz, R
    NERVENHEILKUNDE, 1998, 17 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [3] Risks associated with ionizing radiation
    Little, MP
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 68 : 259 - 275
  • [4] Health risks of ionizing radiation
    Schneider, G
    Burkart, W
    RADIOLOGE, 1998, 38 (09): : 719 - 725
  • [5] Ionizing radiation and heart risks
    Bhattacharya, Souparno
    Asaithamby, Aroumougame
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 58 : 14 - 25
  • [6] Managing radiation risks
    Clarke, RH
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 1997, 90 (02) : 88 - 92
  • [7] IONIZING RADIATION - BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS
    MORGAN, KZ
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1969, 17 (04): : 539 - +
  • [8] Carcinogenic risks of prenatal ionizing radiation
    Brent, Robert L.
    SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 19 (03): : 203 - 213
  • [9] RISKS FROM IONIZING-RADIATION
    CLARKE, RH
    SOUTHWOOD, TRE
    NATURE, 1989, 338 (6212) : 197 - 198
  • [10] IONIZING RADIATION - BENEFITS VERSUS RISKS
    MORGAN, KZ
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1968, 15 (02): : 176 - +