Risk factors for failed induction in nulliparous women

被引:21
|
作者
Frederiks, Femke [1 ]
Lee, Shalem [1 ]
Dekker, Gus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Women & Childrens Div, Lyell McEwin Hosp, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2012年 / 25卷 / 12期
关键词
Failed induction; risk factors; caesarean section; CESAREAN DELIVERY; LABOR INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PROSTAGLANDIN-E2; DINOPROSTONE; MISOPROSTOL; GEL;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2012.703718
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify risk factors for failed induction in nulliparous women. Material and methods: A retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women admitted for induction of labour (IOL). Identification of risk factors for failed IOL by comparing clinical characteristics of patients with a failed IOL defined as birth by caesarean section (LSCS) with those achieving vaginal birth. Results: During a 12 month episode, 400 nulliparous women had an IOL; of these 168 (42%) failed to deliver vaginally. Independent antenatal risk factors for failed IOL were higher maternal age (OR = 1.052 per additional year), being shorter (OR = 1.112 per cm less maternal height) and a lower cervical dilatation score (OR = 1.411 per lower cervical dilatation score). A longer active phase (OR = 1.004 per additional minute) was the only independent intrapartum risk factor for having a LSCS. Conclusions: Maternal age, height and cervical dilatation are independent antepartum risk factors, while duration of active phase is the single independent intrapartum risk factor for a failed IOL. Increased maternal BMI was less of a risk factor than anticipated with increased risk for failed IOL, as independent risk factor, more or less restricted to the morbidly obese women.
引用
收藏
页码:2479 / 2487
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Failed Induction in the Nulliparous Woman with Unfavorable Cervix: Predictive Factors
    Henderson, Jennifer J.
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    Pennell, Craig E.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2009, 16 (03) : 218A - 218A
  • [2] Risk Factors of Dystocia in Nulliparous Women
    Alijahan, Rahele
    Kordi, Masoumeh
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 39 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [3] Factors Influencing Induction of Labour Success in Nulliparous Women
    Grover, H.
    Pritchard, N.
    Shub, A.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 58 : 30 - 30
  • [4] Risk factors for breast cancer in nulliparous women
    F Fioretti
    A Tavani
    C Bosetti
    C La Vecchia
    E Negri
    F Barbone
    R Talamini
    S Franceschi
    British Journal of Cancer, 1999, 79 : 1923 - 1928
  • [5] Risk factors for breast cancer in nulliparous women
    Fioretti, F
    Tavani, A
    Bosetti, C
    La Vecchia, C
    Negri, E
    Barbone, F
    Talamini, R
    Franceschi, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1999, 79 (11-12) : 1923 - 1928
  • [6] Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength
    Aran, Turhan
    Osmanagaoglu, Mehmet A.
    Kart, Cavit
    Guven, Suleyman
    Sahin, Mustafa
    Unsal, Mesut A.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (08) : 1105 - 1110
  • [7] Failed labor induction in nulliparous women at term: the role of pelvic floor muscle strength
    Turhan Aran
    Mehmet A. Osmanagaoglu
    Cavit Kart
    Suleyman Guven
    Mustafa Sahin
    Mesut A. Unsal
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1105 - 1110
  • [8] Risk Factors for Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Nulliparous Women
    Milan, Kristina
    Henry, Erick
    Hopkins, Paul
    Esplin, Sean
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (03) : 283A - 283A
  • [9] Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women
    Sibai, BM
    Ewell, M
    Levine, RJ
    Klebanoff, MA
    Esterlitz, J
    Catalano, PM
    Goldenberg, RL
    Joffe, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 177 (05) : 1003 - 1010
  • [10] FAILED IUD INSERTIONS IN NULLIPAROUS AND PAROUS WOMEN
    Dermish, A.
    Turok, D.
    Jacobson, J.
    Burke, K.
    Flores, M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (03) : 332 - 332