Reach, Usage, and Effectiveness of a Medicaid Patient Navigator Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cape Fear, North Carolina, 2011

被引:24
|
作者
Leone, Lucia A. [1 ]
Reuland, Daniel S. [2 ]
Lewis, Carmen L. [2 ]
Ingle, Mary [3 ]
Erman, Brian [2 ]
Summers, Tyana J. [4 ]
DuBard, C. Annette [4 ]
Pignone, Michael P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Community Care Lower Cape Fear, Wilmington, NC USA
[4] Community Care North Carolina, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
关键词
DECISION AID; COLON;
D O I
10.5888/pcd10.120221
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Screening for colorectal cancer can reduce incidence and death, but screening is underused, especially among vulnerable groups such as Medicaid patients. Effective interventions are needed to increase screening frequency. Our study consisted of a controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid patients in North Carolina. Methods The intervention included a mailed screening reminder letter and decision aid followed by telephone support from an offsite, Medicaid-based, patient navigator. The study included 12 clinical practices, 6 as intervention practices and 6 as matched controls. Eligible patients were aged 50 years or older, covered by Medicaid, and identified from Medicaid claims data as not current with colorectal cancer screening recommendations. We reviewed Medicaid claims data at 6 months and conducted multivariate logistic regression to compare participant screening in intervention practices with participants in control practices. We controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Most of the sample was black (53.1%) and female (57.2%); the average age was 56.5 years. On the basis of Medicaid claims, 9.2% of intervention participants (n = 22/240) had had a colorectal cancer screening at the 6-month review, compared with 7.5% of control patients (n = 13/174). The adjusted odds ratio when controlling for age, comorbidities, race, sex, and continuous Medicaid eligibility was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-3.06). The patient navigator reached 44 participants (27.6%). Conclusion The intervention had limited reach and little effect after 6 months on the number of participants screened. Higher-intensity interventions, such as use of practice-based navigators, may be needed to reach and improve screening rates in vulnerable populations.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A COMBINED DECISION AID plus PATIENT NAVIGATOR INTERVENTION TO INCREASE COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING AMONG MEDICAID PATIENTS IN NORTH CAROLINA
    Leone, Lucia A.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Lewis, Carmen L.
    Ingle, Mary
    Erman, Brian
    DuBard, Annette
    Pignone, Michael
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 : S148 - S149
  • [2] Combined patient and physician intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening
    Ferreira, MR
    Gorby, N
    Dolan, N
    Fitzgibbon, M
    Davis, T
    Liu, DC
    Rademaker, A
    Bennett, C
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A176 - A176
  • [3] Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic
    Jandorf, L
    Gutierrez, Y
    Lopez, J
    Christie, J
    Itzkowitz, SH
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2005, 82 (02): : 216 - 224
  • [4] Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic
    Lina Jandorf
    Yahaira Gutierrez
    Jaime Lopez
    Jennifer Christie
    Steven H. Itzkowitz
    Journal of Urban Health, 2005, 82 : 216 - 224
  • [5] Effectiveness of patient navigator interventions on uptake of colorectal cancer screening in primary care settings
    Muliira, Joshua Kanaabi
    D'Souza, Melba Sheila
    JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE, 2016, 13 (02) : 205 - 219
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Simulated Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions, North Carolina
    Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
    Cornejo, David A.
    Mayorga, Maria E.
    Pignone, Michael
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    Kuo, Tzy-Mey
    Meyer, Anne-Marie
    Hall, Ingrid J.
    Smith, Judith Lee
    Durham, Todd A.
    Chall, Steven A.
    Crutchfield, Trisha M.
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2017, 14
  • [7] Effectiveness of a theory-based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among Iranian
    Salimzadeh, Hamideh
    Delavari, Alireza
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 567 - 568
  • [8] Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: What would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina
    Hicklin, Karen
    O'Leary, Meghan C.
    Nambiar, Siddhartha
    Mayorga, Maria E.
    Wheeler, Stephanie B.
    Davis, Melinda M.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    Tangka, Florence K. L.
    Lich, Kristen Hassmiller
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 162
  • [9] Effectiveness of a mailed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in an academic primary care practice: A controlled trial
    Lewis, C.
    Brenner, A. T.
    Griffith, J. M.
    Malone, R. M.
    Pignone, M.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 : 104 - 104
  • [10] Effectiveness of health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Eastern-Band Cherokee Indian women in North Carolina
    Dignan, M
    Michielutte, R
    Blinson, K
    Wells, HB
    Case, LD
    Sharp, P
    Davis, S
    Konen, J
    McQuellon, RP
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (22) : 1670 - 1676