Inter-hospital comparison of rates of surgical site infection following caesarean section delivery: evaluation of a multicentre surveillance study

被引:50
|
作者
Wilson, J. [1 ]
Wloch, C. [1 ]
Saei, A. [2 ]
McDougall, C. [1 ]
Harrington, P. [1 ]
Charlett, A. [2 ]
Lamagni, T. [1 ]
Elgohari, S. [1 ]
Sheridan, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy, Dept Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial, London, England
[2] Hlth Protect Agcy, Stat Modelling & Econ Dept, London, England
关键词
Caesarean section; Case-finding; Post-discharge surveillance; Surgical site infection; Surveillance; POSTDISCHARGE SURVEILLANCE; WOUND INFECTIONS; AFTER-DISCHARGE; EXPERIENCE; REDUCTION; ENGLAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2013.01.009
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Short postoperative stays following caesarean section delivery make it difficult to assess accurately the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Methods of case-finding that minimize variation are required to support effective surveillance systems, especially where used for benchmarking. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of case-finding methods for SSI following caesarean delivery and their utility in establishing benchmark rates of SSI. Methods: Hospitals conducted surveillance over one or two 13-week periods. Patients were reviewed during their inpatient stay, post partum by community midwives and via patient questionnaire at 30 days post delivery. To estimate the reliability of case-finding methods, case-note reviews were undertaken in a random sample of four hospitals. Findings: A total of 404 SSIs were detected in 4107 caesarean deliveries from 14 hospitals. The median time to SSI was 10 days, 66% were detected in-hospital or by community midwives, and an additional 34% were patient-reported. The rate of SSI was 9.8% but the proportion of patients followed up varied significantly between centres. The estimated sensitivity and specificity of case-finding was 91.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 53.4-98.4] and 98.6% (95% CI: 98.4-98.8), the positive predictive value 91.0% (95% CI: 82.4-96.1) and negative predictive value 98.6% (95% CI: 93.9-99.5). Conclusions: Combined case ascertainment methods are a feasible way to achieve active post-discharge surveillance and had high negative and positive predictive values. Additional SSIs can be detected by patient questionnaires but rates of SSI were strongly influenced by variation in intensity of both healthcare worker- and patient-based case-finding. This factor must be taken into account when comparing or benchmarking rates of SSI. (c) 2013 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 51
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance
    Johnson, A.
    Young, D.
    Reilly, J.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2006, 64 (01) : 30 - 35
  • [2] Risk Adjustment for Inter-Hospital Comparison of Caesarean Delivery Rates in Low-Risk Deliveries
    Stivanello, Elisa
    Rucci, Paola
    Carretta, Elisa
    Pieri, Giulia
    Seghieri, Chiara
    Nuti, Sabina
    Declercq, Eugene
    Taglioni, Martina
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [3] Inter-hospital comparison for caesarean section in nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex caesarean deliveries
    Pieri, G.
    Carretta, E.
    Dallolio, L.
    Stivanello, E.
    Fantini, M. P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 20 : 140 - 140
  • [4] Enhanced surgical site infection surveillance following caesarean section: experience of a multicentre collaborative post-discharge system
    Ward, V. P.
    Charlett, A.
    Fagan, J.
    Crawshaw, S. C.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2008, 70 (02) : 166 - 173
  • [5] Cost-benefit analysis of surveillance for surgical site infection following caesarean section
    Wloch, Catherine
    Van Hoek, Albert Jan
    Green, Nathan
    Conneely, Joanna
    Harrington, Pauline
    Sheridan, Elizabeth
    Wilson, Jennie
    Lamagni, Theresa
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (07):
  • [6] Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparisons of caesarean section rates in Taipei municipal hospitals
    Hsu, Chun-Chyang
    Shieh, Guahn-Ren
    Wu, Chuan-Song
    Shen, Hsi-che
    Tang, Chao-Hsiun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2006, 127 (02): : 190 - 197
  • [7] Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study
    Wloch, C.
    Wilson, J.
    Lamagni, T.
    Harrington, P.
    Charlett, A.
    Sheridan, E.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (11) : 1324 - 1333
  • [8] SURGICAL SITE INFECTION FOLLOWING LOWER SEGMENT CAESAREAN SECTION IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
    Kondakasseril, Nishi Roshini
    Hiran, Nishitha
    Andrews, Andrews Mekkattukunnel
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (24): : 1306 - 1309
  • [9] Surgical Site Infection Following Elective Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study of Post discharge Surveillance
    Griffiths, Jill
    Demianczuk, Nestor
    Cordoviz, Melody
    Joffe, A. Mark
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2005, 27 (04) : 340 - 344
  • [10] Inter-hospital variation in surgical intensity for trauma admissions: A multicentre cohort study
    Patton, Marie-Pier
    Moore, Lynne
    Farhat, Imen
    Tardif, Pier-Alexandre
    Gonthier, Catherine
    Belcaid, Amina
    Lauzier, Francois
    Turgeon, Alexis
    Clement, Julien
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 74 (11)