Consensus among clinicians on referrals' priority and use of digital decision-making support systems

被引:1
|
作者
Mariotti, Giuliano [1 ]
Siciliani, Luigi [2 ]
Rebba, Vincenzo [3 ,4 ]
Coretti, Silvia [3 ,5 ]
Gentilini, Maria [6 ]
机构
[1] LHU APSS, Dept Governance, Viale Alcide Degasperi 79, I-38123 Trento, Italy
[2] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York, N Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Padua, Dept Econ & Management Marco Fanno, Padua, Italy
[4] CRIEP Interuniv Ctr Res Publ Econ, Padua, Italy
[5] Univ Sapienza, Dept Econ & Law, Rome, Italy
[6] LHU APSS, Epidemiol Serv, Viale Verona, Trento, Italy
关键词
Appropriateness; Decision support system; Outpatient services; Prioritization; Referrals; Waiting lists; GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS; WAITING-TIMES; DIAGNOSIS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.003
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The growing demand for referrals is a main policy concern in health systems. One approach involves the development of demand management tools in the form of clinical prioritization to regulate patient referrals from primary care to specialist care. For clinical prioritization to be effective, it is critical that general practitioners (GPs) assess patient priority in the same way as specialists. The progressive development of IT tools in clinical practice, in the form of electronic referrals support systems (e-RSS), can facilitate clinical prioritization. In this study, we tested if higher use of e-RSS or higher use of high-priority categories was associated with the degree of agreement and therefore consensus on clinical priority between GPs and specialists. We found that higher use by GPs of the e-RSS tool was positively associated with greater degree of priority agreement with specialists, while higher use of the high-priority categories was associated with lower degree of priority agreement with specialists. Furthermore, female GPs, GPs in association with others, and GPs using a specific electronic medical record showed higher agreement with specialists. Our study therefore supports the use of electronic referrals systems to improve clinical prioritization and manage the demand of specialist visits and diagnostic tests. It also shows that there is scope for reducing excessive use by GPs of high-priority categories
引用
收藏
页码:906 / 914
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Substance Use Decision-Making - Are Clinicians Using the Evidence?
    Stokes, Jackie
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SERVICE RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [2] On the use of risk and decision analysis to support decision-making
    Aven, T
    Korte, J
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 79 (03) : 289 - 299
  • [3] DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS - NEW TECHNOLOGY OF DECISION-MAKING
    VAZSONYI, A
    INTERFACES, 1978, 9 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [4] The impact of group decision support systems on decision-making
    Alghamdi, Athir
    Alharbi, Raghad
    Aljohani, Elaaf
    Abdullah, Manal
    International Journal of Data Science, 2024, 9 (01) : 64 - 78
  • [5] DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND DECISION-MAKING - PREFACE
    VENKATARAMANAN, MA
    CABOT, V
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 1995, 21 (12) : R11 - R12
  • [7] Accuracy of intuition in clinical decision-making among novice clinicians
    Price, Amanda
    Zulkosky, Kristen
    White, Krista
    Pretz, Jean
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2017, 73 (05) : 1147 - 1157
  • [8] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Aanand D. Naik
    Dena Schulman-Green
    Ruth McCorkle
    Elizabeth H. Bradley
    Sidney T. Bogardus
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2005, 20 : 640 - 643
  • [9] Will older persons and their clinicians use a shared decision-making instrument?
    Naik, AD
    Schulman-Green, D
    McCorkle, R
    Bradley, EH
    Bogardus, ST
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (07) : 640 - 643
  • [10] Information Systems that Really Support Decision-Making
    Gio Wiederhold
    Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2000, 14 : 85 - 94