Evolutionary conservation analysis between the essential and nonessential genes in bacterial genomes

被引:63
|
作者
Luo, Hao [1 ]
Gao, Feng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lin, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Dept Phys, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Key Lab Syst Bioengn, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Chem Sci & Engn, SynBio Res Platform, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
DATABASE; DEG;
D O I
10.1038/srep13210
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Essential genes are thought to be critical for the survival of the organisms under certain circumstances, and the natural selection acting on essential genes is expected to be stricter than on nonessential ones. Up to now, essential genes have been identified in approximately thirty bacterial organisms by experimental methods. In this paper, we performed a comprehensive comparison between the essential and nonessential genes in the genomes of 23 bacterial species based on the Ka/Ks ratio, and found that essential genes are more evolutionarily conserved than nonessential genes in most of the bacteria examined. Furthermore, we also analyzed the conservation by functional clusters with the clusters of orthologous groups (COGs), and found that the essential genes in the functional categories of G (Carbohydrate transport and metabolism), H (Coenzyme transport and metabolism), I (Transcription), J (Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis), K (Lipid transport and metabolism) and L (Replication, recombination and repair) tend to be more evolutionarily conserved than the corresponding nonessential genes in bacteria. The results suggest that the essential genes in these subcategories are subject to stronger selective pressure than the nonessential genes, and therefore, provide more insights of the evolutionary conservation for the essential and nonessential genes in complex biological processes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evolutionary conservation analysis between the essential and nonessential genes in bacterial genomes
    Hao Luo
    Feng Gao
    Yan Lin
    Scientific Reports, 5
  • [2] Statistical Analysis of Hurst Exponents of Essential/Nonessential Genes in 33 Bacterial Genomes
    Liu, Xiao
    Wang, Baojin
    Xu, Luo
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06):
  • [3] Evolutionary Conservation of Bacterial Essential Metabolic Genes across All Bacterial Culture Media
    Ish-Am, Oren
    Kristensen, David M.
    Ruppin, Eytan
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [4] Information dimension analysis of bacterial essential and nonessential genes based on chaos game representation
    Zhou, Qian
    Yu, Yong-ming
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2014, 47 (46)
  • [5] How essential are nonessential genes?
    Fang, G
    Rocha, E
    Danchin, A
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2005, 22 (11) : 2147 - 2156
  • [6] Comparative analysis of bacterial essential and nonessential genes with Hurst exponent based on chaos game representation
    Zhou, Qian
    Yu, Yong-ming
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2014, 69 : 209 - 216
  • [7] Comparing the evolutionary conservation between human essential genes, human orthologs of mouse essential genes and human housekeeping genes
    Lv, Wenhua
    Zheng, Jiajia
    Luan, Meiwei
    Shi, Miao
    Zhu, Hongjie
    Zhang, Mingming
    Lv, Hongchao
    Shang, Zhenwei
    Duan, Lian
    Zhang, Ruijie
    Jiang, Yongshuai
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 16 (06) : 922 - 931
  • [8] Essentiality, conservation, evolutionary pressure and codon bias in bacterial genomes
    Dilucca, Maddalena
    Cimini, Giulio
    Giansanti, Andrea
    GENE, 2018, 663 : 178 - 188
  • [9] Patterns of Evolutionary Conservation of Essential Genes Correlate with Their Compensability
    Bergmiller, Tobias
    Ackermann, Martin
    Silander, Olin K.
    PLOS GENETICS, 2012, 8 (06):
  • [10] Using bacterial genomes and essential genes for the development of new antibiotics
    Fields, Francisco R.
    Lee, Shaun W.
    McConnell, Michael J.
    BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 134 : 74 - 86