Correcting TG 119 confidence limits

被引:11
|
作者
Kearney, Vasant [1 ]
Solberg, Timothy [1 ]
Jensen, Shane [2 ]
Cheung, Joey [1 ]
Chuang, Cynthia [1 ]
Valdes, Gilmer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
IMRTQA confidence limits; IMRTQA passing rates; TG; 119; TG 119 confidence limits; TG 119 passing rates; IMRT; RATES;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12759
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeTask Group 119 (TG-119) has been adopted for evaluating the adequacy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) commissioning and for establishing patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA) passing criteria in clinical practice. TG-119 establishes 95% confidence limits (CLs), which help clinics identify systematic IMRT QA errors and identify outliers. In TG-119, the 95% CLs are established by fitting the Gamma analysis passing rate results to an assumed distribution, then calculating the limit in which 95% of the data fall. CLs for a given dataset will depend greatly on the type of distribution used, and those determined by following the TG-119 guidelines are only valid if the underlying data follows a Gaussian distribution. Gaussian distributions assume symmetry about the mean, which would imply the possibility of negative analysis failing rates. This study demonstrates that the gamma distribution is a more reasonable assumption for establishing CLs than the Gaussian distribution used in TG-119. Thus, the gamma distribution is suggested as a replacement to the conventional Gaussian statistical model used in TG-119. Materials and methodsThe moments estimator (ME) for the gamma family is used to obtain the CLs of the failing rates for all analysis criteria. To demonstrate the congruence of the gamma distribution, the root mean squared error and the CL values for the MEs of the gamma and the Gaussian families were compared. ResultsIn this study, the empirical 95% CLs generated using 302 plans represent the ground truth, which resulted in a 91.83% passing rate using 3%/3 mm error local criteria. The gamma distribution underestimates the 95% CL by 0.09%, while the Gaussian distribution overestimates the 95% CL by 4.12%. ConclusionsAlthough IMRT QA equipment may vary between clinics, the mathematical formalism presented in this study applies to any combination of planning and delivery systems. This study has demonstrated that a gamma distribution should be favored over a Gaussian distribution when establishing CLs for IMRT QA.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1008
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correcting TG 119 Confidence Interval Formalism Using Bayesian Statistics
    Kearney, V.
    Solberg, T.
    Valdes, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [2] Analyzing the Confidence Limits for IMRT and VMAT On the Basis of AAPM TG 119 Report
    Zhang, J.
    Jiang, D. Z.
    Lyu, M.
    Liu, H.
    Cao, Z.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E637 - E638
  • [3] Analyzation of the local confidence limits for IMRT and VMAT based on AAPM TG119 report
    Zhang, Jun
    Jiang, Dazhen
    Liu, Hui
    Shen, Jiuling
    Wang, Dajiang
    Chen, Cheng
    Xie, Conghua
    Cao, Zhen
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2020, 45 (01) : 66 - 72
  • [4] Local confidence limits for IMRT and VMAT techniques: a study based on TG119 test suite
    M. Thomas
    M. Chandroth
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2014, 37 : 59 - 74
  • [5] Local confidence limits for IMRT and VMAT techniques: a study based on TG119 test suite
    Thomas, M.
    Chandroth, M.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2014, 37 (01) : 59 - 74
  • [6] Local confidence limits in VMAT pre-treatment QA with COMPASS based on AAPM-TG119 and DVH analysis
    Sutto, M.
    Monti, A. F.
    Carbonini, C.
    Canonico, D.
    Rinaldin, G.
    Bindoni, L.
    Begnozzi, L.
    Torresin, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S965 - S966
  • [7] Confidence Limit Variation for a Single System Following the TG119 Protocol
    Gordon, J.
    Krafft, S.
    Jang, S.
    Smith-Raymond, L.
    Stevie, M.
    Hamilton, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [8] Confidence limit variation for a single IMRT system following the TG119 protocol
    Gordon, J. D.
    Krafft, S. P.
    Jang, S.
    Smith-Raymond, L.
    Stevie, M. Y.
    Hamilton, R. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (03) : 1641 - 1648
  • [9] Confidence limits and the limits of confidence
    Kee, F
    QJM-MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS, 2000, 93 (02): : 121 - 124
  • [10] CONFIDENCE LIMITS
    GREEN, M
    LANCET, 1972, 2 (7776): : 538 - &