Background: High-sensitivity troponin assays are now available for clinical use. We investigated whether early measurement with such an assay is superior to a conventional assay in the evaluation of acute coronary syndromes. Methods: Patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain who did not have ST-segment elevation were prospectively recruited from November 2007 to December 2010. Patients underwent serial testing with a conventional cardiac troponin I assay. Samples were also obtained at presentation and two hours later for measurement of troponin T levels using a high-sensitivity assay. The primary outcome was diagnosis of myocardial infarction on admission; secondary outcomes were death, myocardial infarction and heart failure at one year. Results: Of the 939 patients enrolled in the study, 205 (21.8%) had myocardial infarction. By two hours after presentation, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile of the general population (14 ng/L) had a sensitivity of 92.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.1%-95.0%) and a specificity of 79.7% (95% CI 78.6%-80.5%) for the diagnosis of non-ST-segment myocardial infarction. The sensitivity of the assay at presentation was 100% among patients who presented four to six hours after symptom onset. By one year, the high-sensitivity troponin T assay was found to be superior than the conventional assay in predicting death (hazard ratio [HR] 5.4, 95% CI 2.7-10.7) and heart failure (HR 27.8, 95% CI 6.6-116.4), whereas the conventional assay was superior in predicting non fatal myocardial infarction (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.4-6.7). Interpretation: The high-sensitivity troponin T assay at the cut-off point of the 99th percentile was highly sensitive for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by two hours after presentation and had prognostic utility be yond that of the conventional assay. To rule out myocardial infarction, the optimal time to test a second sample using the high-sensitivity troponin T level may be four to six hours after symptom onset, but this finding needs verification in future studies before it can become routine practice.
机构:
Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Dept Med, Solna, Sweden
Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Nejatian, Atosa
Omstedt, Asa
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Dept Med, Solna, Sweden
Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Omstedt, Asa
Hoijer, Jonas
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Inst, Unit Biostat IMM, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Hoijer, Jonas
Hansson, L. O.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Uppsala Univ, Clin Chem, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Hansson, L. O.
Djarv, Therese
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Dept Med, Solna, Sweden
Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Djarv, Therese
Eggers, Kai M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Uppsala, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Eggers, Kai M.
Svensson, Per
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden
Dept Med, Solna, Sweden
Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, SwedenKarolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Funct Area Emergency Med, Stockholm, Sweden