Is the Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion/Atypical Squamous Cells Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Category' Associated with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2?

被引:5
|
作者
Cetiner, Handan [1 ]
Kir, Gozde [2 ]
Kaygusuz, Ecmel [1 ]
Saglican, Yesim [3 ]
Kabaca, Canan [4 ]
机构
[1] Zeynep Kamil Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Umraniye Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Acibadem Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Zeynep Kamil Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; Bethesda system; Cervical cytology; ASC-H; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; DIAGNOSIS; HSIL; LSIL; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.1159/000353824
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Objective: A number of cervical smears may exhibit unequivocal low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) in association with atypical cells cytomorphologically suspicious, but not sufficient to be interpreted as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). These lesions are presently called LSIL, atypical squamous cells cannot exclude HSIL (LSIL/ASC-H). Previous studies have shown that LSIL/ASC-H and ASC-H are both equivocal for HSIL and have a high risk of underlying HSIL. However, in researching the literature only two studies were found which rendered the results as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and CIN3 separately. The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of biopsy results for CIN2 and CIN3 in patients with ASC-H, HSIL, and LSIL/ASC-H. Study Design: Between January 2005 and December 2011, cervicovaginal smears (98,594) with a diagnosis of ASC-H, LSIL, LSIL/ASC-H, or HSIL were re-evaluated to determine the prevalence of future lesion development. Results: A total of 252 patients who had histologic follow-up within a year were selected. Among these, LSIL/ASC-H (31.7%) had the highest prevalence of CIN2 between LSIL (9.3%), ASC-H (10%), and HSIL (16%). All differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: Because of the high predictive value of CIN2, LSIL/ASC-H may have further importance, especially in women of different age groups. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 584
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on cervical smear
    Hong, Sung Ran
    Kim, Bock Man
    Park, Jong Sook
    Choi, Kum Ja
    Kim, Hye Sun
    Kim, Hy Sook
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 111 (05): : 387 - 387
  • [2] Clinical Significance of the Diagnosis of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
    Alsharif, Mariam
    Kjeldahl, Klint
    Curran, Colleen
    Miller, Shelby
    Gulbahce, H. Evin
    Pambuccian, Stefan E.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2009, 117 (02) : 92 - 100
  • [3] The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests
    Elsheikh, Tarik M.
    Kirkpatrick, Joseph L.
    Wu, Howard H.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 108 (05): : 277 - 281
  • [4] Pathology Correlates of a Papanicolaou Diagnosis of Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion
    Al-Nourhji, Omar
    Beckmann, Michael J.
    Markwell, Stephen J.
    Massad, L. Stewart
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 114 (06) : 469 - 473
  • [5] The significance of the papanicolaou smear diagnosis of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion
    Nasser, SM
    Cibas, ES
    Crum, CP
    Faquin, WC
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 99 (05): : 272 - 276
  • [6] Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion is a distinct cytologic category: Histologic outcomes and HPV prevalence
    Owens, Christopher L.
    Moats, Diana R.
    Burroughs, Frances H.
    Gustafson, Karen S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2007, 128 (03) : 398 - 403
  • [7] Should "low-Grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" be a distinct cytologic category?
    Owens, C. L.
    Rojas, D. N.
    Burroughs, F. H.
    Gustafson, K. S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 78A - 79A
  • [8] Should "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" be a distinct cytologic category?
    Owens, C. L.
    Rojas, D. N.
    Burroughs, F. H.
    Gustafson, K. S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 78A - 79A
  • [9] Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion, Cannot Exclude High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion A Category With an Increased Outcome of High-Grade Lesions: Use as a Quality Assurance Measure
    Nishino, Ha T.
    Wilbur, David C.
    Tambouret, Rosemary H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 (02) : 198 - 202
  • [10] Management of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and potential complications
    Montz, FJ
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 43 (02): : 394 - 409