Does pelvic venous congestion syndrome exist and can it be treated?

被引:11
|
作者
Ball, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Khalid S. [1 ,2 ]
Meads, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal London Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Primary Care & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词
Pelvic venous congestion syndrome; pelvic venous reflux; chronic pelvic pain; ovarian artery embolization; evidence based review; OVARIAN VEIN EMBOLIZATION; PAIN; WOMEN; EMBOLOTHERAPY; INCOMPETENCE; LAPAROSCOPY; MORBIDITY; VARICES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01368.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and costly health problem in gynecology. Operative pathological findings are often absent. In some women with CPP, pelvic venous congestion has been reported; however, this observation has also been made in asymptomatic women. Thus, it is not clear whether pelvic venous congestion causes CPP and, if it does, whether it is a direct or indirect cause. Venography and non-invasive imaging methods are used for the diagnosis, but scoring systems have not been validated. The current mainstay of treatment is venography-controlled embolization, which is less invasive than surgical interventions. However, the only evidence on effectiveness comes from uncontrolled case series. A systematic review of causation evidence is needed to prove whether pelvic venous congestion causes CPP and whether embolization treatment is effective. In addition, if causation is established, good-quality primary randomized controlled trials on embolization may be required.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 528
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条