Ridge Preservation Using Composite Alloplastic Materials: A Randomized Control Clinical and Histological Study in Humans

被引:37
|
作者
Mayer, Yaniv [1 ]
Zigdon-Giladi, Hadar [2 ]
Machtei, Eli E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Dept Periodont, Sch Grad Dent, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
[2] Sch Grad Dent, Dept Periodont, Head Lab Bone Regenerat, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
[3] Head Sch Grad Dent, Dept Periodont, Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
关键词
alloplast; beta TCP; bi phasic calcium sulphate; bone regeneration; bone resorption; socket preservation; BIPHASIC CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; BONE-GRAFT SUBSTITUTE; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; TOOTH EXTRACTION; SULFATE; DOG; REGENERATION; COLLAGEN; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12415
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
AimTo evaluate (clinically, histologically, and histo-morphometrically) the use of composite materials (Biphasic calcium sulphate [BCS] with Tri-Calcium Phosphate (-TCP) and Hydroxyapatite [HA]) in extraction socket sites and compare it to un-disturbed natural healing. Material and MethodsProspective clinical trial of 36 patients (40 extraction sockets) were randomly assigned to either test or control group. Alveolar ridge horizontal dimension was measured in the middle of the socket at crest and 3 and 6 mm subcrestally. Crestal vertical height was measured at baseline surgery and at 4 month re-entry, at which time bone core biopsies were harvested from the center of the edentulous ridge. Histo-morphometric evaluation of the samples was performed using hematoxylin & eosin stains and morphometric software. ResultsThe change in horizontal ridge width was higher in the control compared to the experimental group: 2.282.36 mm versus 0.03 +/- 2.32 mm (p=.007) at -3 mm and 2.28 +/- 2.43 versus 0.035 +/- 3.05 (p=.02) at -6 mm, for the experimental and control sites, respectively. The vertical distance form bone crest to neighboring horizontal line interconnecting the neighboring teeth was minimal in both groups (0.307 +/- 2.01 mm versus 0.14 +/- 2.03 mm [p=0.41]). Residual scaffolds occupied 15.99 +/- 11.4% of the volume in the grafted (test) sites while bone area fraction was not statistically different among the groups (47.7 +/- 10.6% versus 52.6 +/- 11.6%, test versus control, respectively p=.39). The percentage of connective tissue in the control group was significantly higher that test group (36.3 +/- 19.4% versus 46.7 +/- 10.6% test versus control, respectively, p=.013). ConclusionRidge preservation technique using a combination of two synthetic bone grafts -TCP and HA with BCS resulted in greater stability in the horizontal dimension after 4 months.
引用
收藏
页码:1163 / 1170
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans
    Serino, G
    Biancu, S
    Iezzi, G
    Piattelli, A
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (05) : 651 - 658
  • [2] Performance of an alloplastic material versus a mineralized allograft in alveolar ridge preservation: Clinical, micro-CT and histological analyses
    Pripatnanont, Prisana
    Boonsri, Nattapon
    Monmaturapoj, Naruporn
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2022, 34 (05) : 561 - 570
  • [3] Dimensional Evaluation of Different Ridge Preservation Techniques: A Randomized Clinical Study
    Fickl, Stefan
    Fischer, Kai
    Petersen, Nicole
    Happe, Arndt
    Schlee, Markus
    Schlagenhauf, Ulrich
    Kebschull, Moritz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 37 (03) : 403 - 410
  • [4] Composite Alloplastic Biomaterial vs. Autologous Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Ridge Preservation
    Mendoza-Azpur, Gerardo
    Olaechea, Allinson
    Padial-Molina, Miguel
    Gutierrez-Garrido, Lourdes
    O'Valle, Francisco
    Mesa, Francisco
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02)
  • [5] Postextractive Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using L-PRF: Clinical and Histological Evaluation
    Serafini, Giorgio
    Lollobrigida, Marco
    Fortunato, Lorenzo
    Mazzucchi, Giulia
    Lamazza, Luca
    Di Nardo, Dario
    Vozza, Iole
    Riminucci, Mara
    De Biase, Alberto
    CASE REPORTS IN DENTISTRY, 2020, 2020
  • [6] Histological Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Different Bone Grafts: Clinical Study Analysis Part II
    Jafarian, John
    Shahrabi-Farahani, Shokoufeh
    Ferreira, Cimara Fortes
    Stewart, Colette Whitley
    Luepke, Paul
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2024, 50 (03) : 260 - 265
  • [7] Alveolar ridge preservation with a collagen cone: Histological, histochemical, and immunohistochemical results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Schnutenhaus, Sigmar
    Edelmann, Cornelia
    Dreyhaupt, Jens
    Rudolph, Heike
    Luthardt, Ralph G.
    Goetz, Werner
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 6 (03): : 345 - 355
  • [8] Alveolar Ridge Preservation With the Socket-Plug Technique Utilizing an Alloplastic Putty Bone Substitute or a Particulate Xenograft: A Histological Pilot Study
    Mahesh, Lanka
    Venkataraman, Narayan
    Shukla, Sagrika
    Prasad, Hari
    Kotsakis, Georgios A.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (02) : 178 - 183
  • [9] Flap versus flapless procedure for ridge preservation in alveolar extraction sockets: a histological evaluation in a randomized clinical trial
    Barone, Antonio
    Borgia, Valentina
    Covani, Ugo
    Ricci, Massimiliano
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (07) : 806 - 813
  • [10] Flap versus flapless alveolar ridge preservation: A clinical and histological single-blinded, randomized controlled trial
    Siu, Trever L.
    Dukka, Himabindu
    Saleh, Muhammad H. A.
    Tattan, Mustafa
    Dib, Ziad
    Ravida, Andrea
    Greenwell, Henry
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Araujo, Mauricio G.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2023, 94 (02) : 184 - 192