Kinetic aspects of hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction

被引:76
|
作者
Gjelstad, Astrid [1 ]
Jensen, Henrik [2 ]
Rasmussen, Knut Einar [1 ]
Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Sch Pharm, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut & Analyt Chem, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction; Electromembrane extraction; Supported liquid membrane; Extraction kinetics; Basic drugs; ELECTROKINETIC MIGRATION; SAMPLE PREPARATION; CAPILLARY-ELECTROPHORESIS; BIOLOGICAL-FLUIDS; BASIC DRUGS; MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aca.2011.12.039
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper, extraction kinetics was investigated experimentally and theoretically in hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and electromembrane extraction (EME) with the basic drugs droperidol, haloperidol, nortriptyline, clomipramine, and clemastine as model analytes. In HF-LPME, the analytes were extracted by passive diffusion from an alkaline sample, through a (organic) supported liquid membrane (SLM) and into an acidic acceptor solution. In EME, the analytes were extracted by electrokinetic migration from an acidic sample, through the SLM, and into an acidic acceptor solution by application of an electrical potential across the SLM. In both HF-LPME and EME, the sample (donor solution) was found to be rapidly depleted for analyte. In HF-LPME, the mass transfer across the SLM was slow, and this was found to be the rate limiting step of HF-LPME. This finding is in contrast to earlier discussions in the literature suggesting that mass transfer across the boundary layer at the donor-SLM interface is the rate limiting step of HF-LPME. In EME, mass transfer across the SLM was much more rapid due to electrokinetic migration. Nevertheless, mass transfer across the SLM was rate limiting even in EME. Theoretical models were developed to describe the kinetics in HF-LPME, in agreement with the experimental findings. In HF-LPME, the extraction efficiency was found to be maintained even if pH in the donor solution was lowered from 10 to 7-8, which was below the pK(a)-value for several of the analytes. Similarly, in EME, the extraction efficiency was found to be maintained even if pH in the donor solution increased from 4 to 11, which was above the pk(a)-value for several of the analytes. The two latter experiments suggested that both techniques may be used to effectively extract analytes from samples in a broader pH range as compared to the pH range recommended in the literature. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Liquid-Phase Microextraction or Electromembrane Extraction?
    Wan, Libin
    Lin, Bin
    Zhu, Ruiqin
    Huang, Chuixiu
    Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig
    Shen, Xiantao
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 91 (13) : 8267 - 8273
  • [2] Extraction performance of electromembrane extraction and liquid-phase microextraction in prototype equipment
    Schuller, Maria
    Hansen, Frederik Andre
    Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2023, 1710
  • [3] Liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines: hollow fiber–liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction comparison
    Nerea Lorenzo-Parodi
    Wiebke Kaziur-Cegla
    Astrid Gjelstad
    Torsten C. Schmidt
    Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2023, 415 : 1765 - 1776
  • [4] Kinetic calibration for automated hollow fiber-protected liquid-phase microextraction
    Ouyang, Gangfeng
    Pawliszyn, Janusz
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 78 (16) : 5783 - 5788
  • [5] Three-phase hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction
    Gjelstad, Astrid
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2019, 113 : 25 - 31
  • [6] Developments of Liquid-Phase Microextraction Based on Hollow Fiber
    Wang Chun
    Wu Qiuhua
    Wang Zhi
    Han Dandan
    Hu Yanxue
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 2006, 24 (05) : 516 - 523
  • [7] Two-phase hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction
    Esrafili, Ali
    Baharfar, Mahroo
    Tajik, Mohammad
    Yamini, Yadollah
    Ghambarian, Mahnaz
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 108 : 314 - 322
  • [8] Liquid-phase microextraction of aromatic amines: hollow fiber-liquid-phase microextraction and parallel artificial liquid membrane extraction comparison
    Lorenzo-Parodi, Nerea
    Kaziur-Cegla, Wiebke
    Gjelstad, Astrid
    Schmidt, Torsten C.
    ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 415 (09) : 1765 - 1776
  • [9] Comparison of conventional hollow fiber based liquid phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction efficiencies for the extraction of ephedrine from biological fluids
    Fotouhi, Lida
    Yamini, Yadollah
    Molaei, Saeideh
    Seidi, Shahram
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2011, 1218 (48) : 8581 - 8586
  • [10] Analysis of basic drugs in biological samples using dynamic single-interface hollow fiber liquid-phase microextraction combined with fast electromembrane extraction
    Rahimi, Atyeh
    Nojavan, Saeed
    Maghsoudi, Majid
    MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 157