Family physicians' preferences for computerized decision-support hardware and software

被引:0
|
作者
Ebell, MH [1 ]
Gaspar, DL [1 ]
Khurana, S [1 ]
机构
[1] WAYNE STATE UNIV,DEPT FAMILY MED,DETROIT,MI 48202
来源
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE | 1997年 / 45卷 / 02期
关键词
physicians; family; attitude to computers; software; decision-support systems; medical informatics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. While computers are now widely used by family physicians for billing and patient registration purposes, their use as decision-support tools is still quite limited. The purpose of this study was to determine the current use of computer hardware and software by family physicians, and the characteristics these physicians desire in computerized decision-support hardware and software. METHODS. A cross-sectional survey of a random sample of 250 Michigan family physicians was undertaken in mid-1995. These physicians were asked about their current use of a variety of computer hardware and software. They were also asked to rate the value of different kinds of decision-support information potentially available by computer. The survey instrument also gathered the family physicians' preferences for design factors (both hardware and software), such as the size of a computer, the time needed to access information, and the frequency of updates, RESULTS. Word processing on desktop computers and hospital information systems are the most widely used computer applications by family physicians. Physicians are most interested in computer-based information on drugs, storage and generation of patient education materials, and accessing treatment recommendations. Most feel that semiannual or annual updates of information are adequate, and would like a uniform interface. A high percentage of physicians (84.5% of all physicians and 94.1% of younger physicians) stated that they would consider carrying a handheld computer, CONCLUSIONS. There is significant interest in several types of clinical decision-support software. Based on the results of this study, such software should have following characteristics: (1) be available for handheld as well as networked and desktop computers, (2) include drug information (particularly warnings, interactions, and side effects), (3) include overviews of treatment recommendations, (4) include patient education materials, and (5) have a uniform user interface and be updated at least annually.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 141
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] REPRESENTATION OF PREFERENCES IN DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    FARR, BR
    SHACHTER, RD
    COMPUTERS AND BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 25 (04): : 324 - 335
  • [2] Decision-support software to help primary care physicians triage skin cancer
    Maurer, TA
    Berger, TG
    Gerbert, B
    Bronstone, A
    Maffei, K
    Hofmann, R
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1999, 135 (08) : 969 - 970
  • [3] INTEGRATED DECISION-SUPPORT FOR HARDWARE INVESTMENT PLANNING
    WIRTH, A
    SATZGER, G
    WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, 1994, 36 (06): : 535 - 545
  • [4] Eliciting User Decision Requirements for Designing Computerized Diagnostic Support for Family Physicians
    Porat, Talya
    Kostopoulou, Olga
    Woolley, Amanda
    Delaney, Brendan C.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2016, 10 (01) : 57 - 73
  • [5] COMPUTERIZED DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN PRIMARY-CARE
    ELSON, RB
    CONNELLY, DP
    PRIMARY CARE, 1995, 22 (02): : 365 - 384
  • [7] COUPLER - DECISION SUPPORT SOFTWARE FOR PHYSICIANS
    TEITELBAUM, HS
    YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1987, 60 (05): : 500 - 501
  • [8] Prediction of bacteremia using TREAT, a computerized decision-support system
    Paul, M
    Andreassen, S
    Nielsen, AD
    Tacconelli, E
    Almanasreh, N
    Fraser, A
    Yahav, D
    Ram, R
    Leibovici, L
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (09) : 1274 - 1282
  • [9] Application of decision-support software for postemergence weed control
    Berti, A
    Bravin, F
    Zanin, G
    WEED SCIENCE, 2003, 51 (04) : 618 - 627