Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to Rh(D) incompatibility: A preventable disease that still produces significant morbidity and mortality in children

被引:35
|
作者
Pegoraro, Valeria [1 ]
Urbinati, Ducciocompet [1 ]
Visser, Gerard H. A. [2 ]
Di Renzo, Gian Carlo [3 ,4 ]
Zipursky, Alvin [5 ]
Stotler, Brie A. [6 ]
Spitalnik, Steven L. [6 ]
机构
[1] IQVIA Solut Italy Srl, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Med Ctr, Dept Obstet, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Perugia, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perugia, Italy
[4] IM Sechenov First State Univ Moscow, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Moscow, Russia
[5] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Columbia Univ, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, New York, NY 10027 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
RH IMMUNE GLOBULIN; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0235807
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the mid-20(th)century, Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn, caused by maternal alloimmunization to the Rh(D) blood group antigen expressed by fetal red blood cells (i.e., "Rh disease"), was a major cause of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, with the regulatory approval, in 1968, of IgG anti-Rh(D) immunoprophylaxis to prevent maternal sensitization, the prospect of eradicating Rh disease was at hand. Indeed, the combination of antenatal and post-partum immunoprophylaxis is similar to 99% effective at preventing maternal sensitization to Rh(D). To investigate global compliance with this therapeutic intervention, we used an epidemiological approach to estimate the current annual number of pregnancies worldwide involving an Rh(D)-negative mother and an Rh(D)-positive fetus. The annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) IgG required for successful immunoprophylaxis for these cases was then calculated and compared with an estimate of the annual number of doses of anti-Rh(D) produced and provided worldwide. Our results suggest that similar to 50% of the women around the world who require this type of immunoprophylaxis do not receive it, presumably due to a lack of awareness, availability, and/or affordability, thereby putting hundreds of thousands of fetuses and neonates at risk for Rh disease each year. The global failure to provide this generally acknowledged standard-of-care to prevent Rh disease, even 50 years after its availability, contributes to an enormous, continuing burden of fetal and neonatal disease and provides a critically important challenge to the international health care system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A REVIEW OF HEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF THE FETUS AND NEWBORN DUE TO MN INCOMPATIBILITY IN JAPAN
    Yasuda, H.
    Nollet, K.
    Ohto, H.
    VOX SANGUINIS, 2009, 97 : 125 - 125
  • [3] Rh hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn in Montenegro
    Raicevic, S.
    Bralic, I.
    Haliti, A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XX EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2006, : 153 - +
  • [4] Hemolytic Disease of Newborn: Beyond Rh-D and ABO Incompatibility
    Ashwini Karanam
    Prathik Bandiya
    Indian Pediatrics, 2021, 58 : 794 - 795
  • [5] Hemolytic Disease of Newborn: Beyond Rh-D and ABO Incompatibility
    Karanam, Ashwini
    Bandiya, Prathik
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2021, 58 (08) : 794 - 795
  • [6] HEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF NEWBORN DUE TO ABO INCOMPATIBILITY
    FISCHER, K
    POSCHMANN, A
    GRUNDMANN, A
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND PERINATOLOGIE, 1977, 181 (04): : 227 - 240
  • [7] HEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF THE NEWBORN DUE TO ABO INCOMPATIBILITY
    DUNN, HG
    AMA AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1953, 85 (06): : 655 - 674
  • [8] Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Due to an Antibody to the High Prevalence Rh:46
    Brown, Michelle R.
    Afiouni, Reina R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 140 : 191 - 191
  • [9] USEFULNESS OF METHOD OF LALEZARI FOR DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF HEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF NEWBORN DUE TO RH INCOMPATIBILITY
    LEPETIT, JC
    LYOEN, H
    BRIZARD, CP
    REVUE FRANCAISE DE TRANSFUSION, 1975, 18 (04): : 522 - 524
  • [10] MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY FROM HEMOLYTIC DISEASE OF THE NEWBORN
    BOGGS, TR
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1964, 7 (04): : 933 - 944