Decentralization and participation in integrated coastal management: Policy lessons from Brazil and Indonesia

被引:79
|
作者
Wever, L. [1 ]
Glaser, M. [1 ]
Gorris, P. [1 ]
Ferrol-Schulte, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Trop Marine Ecol ZMT, D-28359 Bremen, Germany
关键词
MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; ZONE MANAGEMENT; FISHERIES COMANAGEMENT; OCEAN MANAGEMENT; NORTH BRAZIL; SULAWESI; RESOURCES; IMPLEMENTATION; CONSERVATION; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.001
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
Indonesia and Brazil, two large countries with long coastlines, have seen dramatic political changes over past decades. The New Constitution of 1988 in Brazil and the reform movement of 1998 in Indonesia both marked the beginning of a new political era in the respective countries. An important pillar of this was the decentralization of authority. At the same time, the notion of integrated coastal management found its way into national legislation and policies. Key terms during these new eras in both Brazil and Indonesia are decentralization, participation, democratization and, in the context of coastal management, integration. Despite the enactment of promising new laws and policies, and despite local examples of success, implementation still faces a number of challenges in both countries. Inefficiencies and weaknesses of the institutional and legal frameworks have resulted in local mismanagement and misappropriation, a high degree of non-compliance, conflicts between resource users and tension and mistrust between different levels and sections of government. Moreover, the disempowered situation of poorer local ecosystem users largely continues. We argue here that for coastal management to become socially more just and environmentally more benign, local communities need to be better informed, capacitated and officially supported in their quest to protect the ecosystems which their livelihoods depend on. Local ecosystem users' social energies and capacities may be essential to respond to ecosystem stakeholders which do not share local ecosystem users' sustainability agendas. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 72
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative decentralization lessons from Pakistan, Indonesia, and the Philippines
    Guess, GM
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2005, 65 (02) : 217 - 230
  • [2] Practicing Coastal Adaptation to Climate Change: Lessons from Integrated Coastal Management
    Tobey, James
    Rubinoff, Pamela
    Robadue, Donald, Jr.
    Ricci, Glen
    Volk, Richard
    Furlow, John
    Anderson, Glen
    COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 38 (03) : 317 - 335
  • [4] Lessons from Brazil's unsuccessful fiscal decentralization policy to fight COVID-19
    Cardoso, Ricardo Lopes
    de Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha
    Magrini Pigatto, Jose Alexandre
    Guelber Fajardo, Bernardo de Abreu
    Moreira da Cunha, Armando Santos
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 43 (02) : 106 - 119
  • [5] DECENTRALIZATION IN COASTAL MANAGEMENT: THE MUNICIPALIZATION OF BEACH MANAGEMENT IN CEARA STATE (NE BRAZIL)
    Costa Sousa, Erica Nadia
    de Paula, Davis Pereira
    GEOGRAPHIA-UFF, 2022, 24 (52):
  • [6] Towards adaptive coastal management law: Lessons from Australia and Brazil
    Frohlich, Miguel
    Smith, Timothy F.
    Fidelman, Pedro
    Baldwin, Claudia
    Jacobson, Chris
    Carter, R. W.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 219
  • [7] Integrated coastal management at the regional level:: lessons from Toliary, Madagascar
    Billé, R
    Mermet, L
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 45 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [8] Education and training in integrated coastal management: lessons from the international arena
    Cicin-Sain, B
    Knecht, RW
    Vallega, A
    Harakunarak, A
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 43 (4-5) : 291 - 330
  • [9] Lessons learned from practicing integrated coastal management in Southeast Asia
    Chua, TE
    AMBIO, 1998, 27 (08) : 599 - 610
  • [10] COASTAL CONSERVATION POLICIES AND INTEGRATED COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT (ICZM) IN INDONESIA
    Nandi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2014, 5 (03) : 387 - 396