Determining significance of pairwise co-occurrences of events in bursty sequences

被引:14
|
作者
Haiminen, Niina [1 ]
Mannila, Heikki [1 ,2 ]
Terzi, Evimaria [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Comp Sci, HIIT, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Lab Comp & Informat Sci, HIIT, FI-02015 Helsinki, Finland
[3] IBM Corp, Almaden Res Ctr, San Jose, CA 95120 USA
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-9-336
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Event sequences where different types of events often occur close together arise, e. g., when studying potential transcription factor binding sites (TFBS, events) of certain transcription factors (TF, types) in a DNA sequence. These events tend to occur in bursts: in some genomic regions there are more genes and therefore potentially more binding sites, while in some, possibly very long regions, hardly any events occur. Also some types of events may occur in the sequence more often than others. Tendencies of co-occurrence of binding sites of two or more TFs are interesting, as they may imply a co-operative role between the TFs in regulatory processes. Determining a numerical value to summarize the tendency for co-occurrence between two TFs can be done in a number of ways. However, testing for the significance of such values should be done with respect to a relevant null model that takes into account the global sequence structure. Results: We extend the existing techniques that have been considered for determining the significance of co-occurrence patterns between a pair of event types under different null models. These models range from very simple ones to more complex models that take the burstiness of sequences into account. We evaluate the models and techniques on synthetic event sequences, and on real data consisting of potential transcription factor binding sites. Conclusion: We show that simple null models are poorly suited for bursty data, and they yield many false positives. More sophisticated models give better results in our experiments. We also demonstrate the effect of the window size, i.e., maximum co-occurrence distance, on the significance results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining significance of pairwise co-occurrences of events in bursty sequences
    Niina Haiminen
    Heikki Mannila
    Evimaria Terzi
    BMC Bioinformatics, 9
  • [2] THE MARATHI VERBAL SEQUENCES AND THEIR CO-OCCURRENCES
    SOUTHWORTH, FC
    LANGUAGE, 1961, 37 (02) : 201 - 208
  • [3] Crowdsourcing via Pairwise Co-occurrences: Identifiability and Algorithms
    Ibrahim, Shahana
    Fu, Xiao
    Kargas, Nikos
    Huang, Kejun
    ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 32 (NIPS 2019), 2019, 32
  • [4] Co-occurrences of / and /
    Badiou-Monferran, Claire
    Capin, Daniela
    CEDILLE-REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS FRANCESES, 2021, (19): : 89 - 125
  • [5] Learning Hidden Markov Models from Pairwise Co-occurrences with Application to Topic Modeling
    Huang, Kejun
    Fu, Xiao
    Sidiropoulos, Nicholas D.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 80, 2018, 80
  • [6] SOME CO-OCCURRENCES IN AMERICAN CLICHES
    CROFT, K
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 1967, 1 (02) : 47 - 49
  • [7] A syntagmatic analysis of antonym co-occurrences in Chinese: contrastive constructions and co-occurrence sequences
    Hsu, Chan-Chia
    CORPORA, 2015, 10 (01) : 47 - 82
  • [8] Laughter and smiling: Notes on co-occurrences
    Haakana, Markku
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2010, 42 (06) : 1499 - 1512
  • [9] Isolating interactions from co-occurrences
    Kevin Cazelles
    Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2024, 8 : 184 - 185
  • [10] Isolating interactions from co-occurrences
    Cazelles, Kevin
    NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2024, 8 (02) : 184 - 185