Update in Sepsis 2012

被引:24
|
作者
Russell, James A. [1 ]
Walley, Keith R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Inst Heart Lung Hlth, Crit Care Res Labs, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
sepsis; septic shock; trials; animal models; review; HYDROXYETHYL STARCH; FLUID-MANAGEMENT; SEPTIC SHOCK; THERAPY; RESUSCITATION; SURVIVORS; OUTCOMES; MICE;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.201303-0567UP
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Pivotal sepsis clinical trials and preclinical research in 2012 are reviewed. For interventions ranging from synthetic complex starch solutions to recombinant human activated protein C, large multicenter randomized controlled trials generally failed to show benefit and some even demonstrated harm in the intervention group. In smaller innovative clinical trials simple interventions such as external cooling to control fever and biomarker-guided weaning from mechanical ventilation found potential benefit. Biomarkers for sepsis, including multimarker panels, are increasingly showing promise for clinical application. Breakthroughs in basic research in sepsis continue to highlight the complexity of the systemic inflammatory response and its consequences. A series of publications in AJRCCM follow the septic inflammatory response starting from intracellular structures and organelles to mitochondria and the cytoskeleton. Additional publications explore the key leukocyte subsets acting in sepsis, highlighting the underappreciated role of helper T-cell type 2-related pathways. Cellular remnants in the form of microparticles contribute to coagulopathy and further organ dysfunction. As a consequence, we suggest that sepsis may be the paradigm disease or condition requiring personalized care first to discover and validate new therapies and second to increase survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1307
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sepsis: update 2012
    Kochanek, M.
    Shimabukuro-Vornhagen, A.
    von Bergwelt-Baildon, M.
    Michels, G.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2012, 137 (31-32) : 1565 - 1567
  • [2] International guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Update 2012
    Briegel, J.
    Moehnle, P.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2013, 62 (04): : 304 - +
  • [3] The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2012: Update for Emergency Physicians
    Jones, Alan E.
    Puskarich, Michael A.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 63 (01) : 35 - 47
  • [4] THE 2012 GUIDELINES FOR SEVERE SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK: AN UPDATE FOR EMERGENCY NURSING
    Rosini, Jamie M.
    Srivastava, Nicole
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY NURSING, 2013, 39 (06) : 652 - 656
  • [5] The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock—An Update on the Guidelines for Initial Therapy
    Jeffrey P. Green
    Jason Adams
    Edward A. Panacek
    Timothy A. Albertson
    Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports, 2013, 1 (3) : 154 - 171
  • [6] The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock-An Update on the Guidelines for Initial Therapy
    Green, Jeffrey P.
    Adams, Jason
    Panacek, Edward A.
    Albertson, Timothy A.
    CURRENT EMERGENCY AND HOSPITAL MEDICINE REPORTS, 2013, 1 (03): : 154 - 171
  • [7] Arthrose - Update 2012 [Arthrose - Update 2012]
    Räuchle M.
    Cemerka M.
    Eibenberger B.
    Breitenseher M.
    Der Radiologe, 2012, 52 (2): : 149 - 155
  • [8] Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guideline Update 2012: What Does it Mean for Perianesthesia Nursing?
    Makic, Mary Beth Flynn
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2013, 28 (04) : 239 - 243
  • [9] Sepsis: an update in 2018
    Bangash, Muhammad Fuad
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2018, 22 : S99 - S101
  • [10] Sepsis: A clinical update
    Ventetuolo, Corey E.
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2008, 3 (02): : 571 - 577