The Role of pro-Social Orientation and National Context in Corporate Environmental Disclosure

被引:15
|
作者
Boura, Maria [1 ]
Tsouknidis, Dimitris A. [2 ]
Lioukas, Spyros [1 ]
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Management Sci & Technol, 76 Patission St, Athens 10434, Greece
[2] Univ Piraeus, Dept Maritime Studies, Piraeus, Greece
关键词
environmental disclosure; pro-social orientation; national context; instrumental stakeholder theory; institutional theory; RESPONSIBILITY CSR; UNITED-STATES; SUSTAINABILITY; PERFORMANCE; SPECIFICATION; REPUTATION; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; ISOMORPHISM; IMPRESSIONS;
D O I
10.1111/emre.12416
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Corporate environmental disclosure can be of strategic value for firms as they project their aspired image and seek to gain recognition and legitimacy. While the importance of environmental disclosure has been thoroughly documented and is understood, research has shed considerably less light on the forces that drive it. In this paper, we set out to explain what determines corporate environmental disclosure. In drawing upon the instrumental stakeholder theory in conjunction with institutional theory, we hypothesize that a firm's pro-social inclination and national institutional factors provide a model for explaining the level of environmental disclosure that a firm applies. To frame and validate this model, we draw data from the Thomson Reuters ASSET4 database. We find that a firm's pro-social orientation has a positive effect on the scale of environmental disclosure. Specifically, the results confirm the proposition that the environmental disclosure of the firm is in line with its pro-social orientation, which manifests as stable characteristic over time. We also show that a country's environmental performance index, openness to international trade and regulatory quality positively impact environmental disclosure, while a high level of corruption affects it negatively.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1040
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRO-SOCIAL ORIENTATION
    MAZIARSKI, J
    SOKOLOWSKA, M
    POLISH SOCIOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, (02): : 145 - 148
  • [2] The Effects of Pro-Social and Pro-Environmental Orientation on Crowdfunding Performance
    von Selasinsky, Constantin
    Lutz, Eva
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [3] The Role of Corporate Governance in the Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Disclosure
    Diamastuti, Erlina
    Muafi, Muafi
    Fitri, Alfiana
    Faizaty, Nur Elisa
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (01): : 187 - 198
  • [4] Determinants of Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure (CSED): In Jordanian context
    Bani-Khalid, Tareq
    Kouhy, Reza
    Hassan, Aminu
    VISION 2020: INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY, AND COMPETITIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2016, VOLS I - VII, 2016, : 3123 - 3148
  • [5] Role of anthropomorphization on pro-social behavior
    Tapar, Archit Vinod
    Mishra, Abhishek
    Sadh, Ashish
    Billore, Aditya
    JOURNAL OF INDIAN BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (01) : 30 - 42
  • [6] Environmental and Pro-Social Norms: Evidence on Littering
    Torgler, Benno
    Frey, Bruno S.
    Wilson, Clevo
    B E JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS & POLICY, 2009, 9 (01):
  • [7] Effectiveness and context dependency of social norm interventions: five field experiments on nudging pro-environmental and pro-social behavior
    Mundt, Daria
    Batzke, Marlene C. L.
    Blaesing, Thanee M.
    Deano, Sandro Gomera
    Helfers, Anna
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [8] THE FREQUENCY AND CONTEXT OF PRO-SOCIAL ACTS ON PRIMETIME TV
    POTTER, WJ
    WARE, W
    JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1989, 66 (02): : 359 - &
  • [9] Corporate environmental, social, and governance information disclosure and audit governance in the context of green development☆
    Wang, Jie
    Zeng, Xiangfei
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 476
  • [10] Why do corporate actors engage in pro-social behaviour? A Bourdieusian perspective on corporate social responsibility
    van Aaken, Dominik
    Splitter, Violetta
    Seidl, David
    ORGANIZATION, 2013, 20 (03) : 349 - 371