Testing emergent gravity with mass densities of galaxy clusters

被引:6
|
作者
Halenka, Vitali [1 ]
Miller, Christopher J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Phys, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Astron, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2020年 / 102卷 / 08期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MATTER HALO CONCENTRATIONS; COMPLETE SAMPLE; WEAK; III; DISTRIBUTIONS; REDSHIFT; FRACTION; STELLAR; PROFILE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.102.084007
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We use a sample of 23 galaxy clusters to test the predictions of emergent gravity (EG) [E.P. Verlinde, SciPost Phys. 2, 016 (2017).] as alternative to dark matter. Our sample has both weak-lensing inferred total mass profiles as well as x-ray inferred baryonic gas mass profiles. Using nominal assumptions about the weak-lensing and x-ray mass profiles, we find that the EG predictions (based on no dark matter) are acceptable fits only near the virial radius. In the cores and in the outskirts, the mass profile shape differences allow us to confirm previous results that the EG model can be ruled out at > 5 sigma. However, when we account for systematic uncertainties in the observed weak-lensing and x-ray profiles, we find good agreement for the EG predictions. For instance, if the weak-lensing total mass profiles are shallow in the core and the x-ray gas density profiles are steep in the outskirts, EG can predict the observed dark matter profile in 0.3 <= r <= 1R(200), where R-200 is the radius which encloses 200x the critical density of the Universe. The required x-ray and lensing shapes are within the current observational systematics-limited errors on cluster profiles. We also show that EG itself allows flexibility in its predictions, which can allow for good agreement between the observations and the predictions. We conclude that we cannot formally rule our EG as an alternative to dark matter on the cluster scale and that we require better constraints on the weak-lensing and gas mass profile shapes in the region 0.3 <= r <= 1R(200).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Testing emergent gravity on galaxy cluster scales
    Tamosiunas, Andrius
    Bacon, David
    Koyama, Kazuya
    Nichol, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2019, (05):
  • [2] Testing Emergent Gravity with Optical, X-Ray, and Weak Lensing Measurements in Massive, Relaxed Galaxy Clusters
    ZuHone, J. A.
    Sims, J.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 880 (02):
  • [3] Mass modeling and kinematics of galaxy clusters in modified gravity
    Pizzuti, Lorenzo
    Boumechta, Yacer
    Haridasu, Sandeep
    Pombo, Alexandre M.
    Dossena, Sofia
    Butt, Minahil Adil
    Benetti, Francesco
    Baccigalupi, Carlo
    Lapi, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2024, (11):
  • [4] Testing Gravity with the Stacked Phase Space around Galaxy Clusters
    Lam, Tsz Yan
    Nishimichi, Takahiro
    Schmidt, Fabian
    Takada, Masahiro
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2012, 109 (05)
  • [5] Hydrostatic mass of galaxy clusters within some theories of gravity
    Apryandi, Feri
    Pattersons, M. Lawrence
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS B, 2025, 1011
  • [6] Testing Screening Mechanisms with Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters
    Pizzuti, Lorenzo
    UNIVERSE, 2022, 8 (03)
  • [7] Dark matter distribution in X-ray luminous galaxy clusters with Emergent Gravity
    Ettori, S.
    Ghirardini, V.
    Eckert, D.
    Dubath, F.
    Pointecouteau, E.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 470 (01) : L29 - L33
  • [8] Tests of gravity with galaxy clusters
    Cataneo, Matteo
    Rapetti, David
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D, 2018, 27 (15):
  • [9] Testing gravity using galaxy clusters: new constraints on beyond Horndeski theories
    Sakstein, Jeremy
    Wilcox, Harry
    Bacon, David
    Koyama, Kazuya
    Nichol, Robert C.
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2016, (07):
  • [10] Testing gravity theories via transverse Doppler and gravitational redshifts in galaxy clusters
    Zhao, HongSheng
    Peacock, John A.
    Li, Baojiu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2013, 88 (04):