Latent ranking analysis using pairwise comparisons in crowdsourcing platforms

被引:2
|
作者
Kim, Younghoon [1 ]
Kim, Wooyeol [2 ]
Shim, Kyuseok [2 ]
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept CS, Ansan, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept ECE, Kwanak POB 34, Seoul 151600, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Learning to rank; Pairwise comparison; Active learning; Crowdsourcing;
D O I
10.1016/j.is.2016.10.002
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ranking items is an essential problem in recommendation systems. Since comparing two items is the simplest type of queries in order to measure the relevance of items, the problem of aggregating pairwise comparisons to obtain a global ranking has been widely studied. Furthermore, ranking with pairwise comparisons has recently received a lot of attention in crowdsourcing systems where binary comparative queries can be used effectively to make assessments faster for precise rankings. In order to learn a ranking based on a training set of queries and their labels obtained from annotators, machine learning algorithms are generally used to find the appropriate ranking model which describes the data set the best. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic model for learning multiple latent rankings by using pairwise comparisons. Our novel model can capture multiple hidden rankings underlying the pairwise comparisons. Based on the model, we develop an efficient inference algorithm to learn multiple latent rankings as well as an effective inference algorithm for active learning to update the model parameters in crowdsourcing systems whenever new pairwise comparisons are supplied. The performance study with synthetic and real-life data sets confirms the effectiveness of our model and inference algorithms.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 21
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Latent Ranking Analysis using Pairwise Comparisons
    Kim, Younghoon
    Kim, Wooyeol
    Shim, Kyuseok
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2014, : 869 - 874
  • [2] Pairwise comparisons in spectral ranking
    Tang, Ying
    Li, Yinrun
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2016, 216 : 561 - 569
  • [3] Worker Ranking Determination in Crowdsourcing Platforms using Aggregation Functions
    Sanchez-Charles, David
    Nin, Jordi
    Sole, Marc
    Muntes-Mulero, Victor
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2014, : 1801 - 1808
  • [4] Ranking with multiple types of pairwise comparisons
    Newman, Mark E. J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2022, 478 (2266):
  • [5] Partial ranking by incomplete pairwise comparisons using preference subsets
    Schubert, Johan (schubert@foi.se), 1600, Springer Verlag (8764):
  • [6] Partial Ranking by Incomplete Pairwise Comparisons Using Preference Subsets
    Schubert, Johan
    BELIEF FUNCTIONS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (BELIEF 2014), 2014, 8764 : 190 - 198
  • [7] Approximate ranking from pairwise comparisons
    Heckel, Reinhard
    Simchowitz, Max
    Ramchandran, Kannan
    Wainwright, Martin J.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 84, 2018, 84
  • [8] Ranking with partial orders and Pairwise Comparisons
    Janicki, Ryszard
    ROUGH SETS AND KNOWLEDGE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 5009 : 442 - 451
  • [9] A new ranking procedure by incomplete pairwise comparisons using preference subsets
    Utkin, Lev V.
    INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2009, 13 (02) : 229 - 241
  • [10] Simultaneous Clustering and Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons
    Li, Jiyi
    Baba, Yukino
    Kashima, Hisashi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2018, : 1554 - 1560