共 50 条
FMRI activation to cannabis odor cues is altered in individuals at risk for a cannabis use disorder
被引:8
|作者:
Kleinhans, Natalia M.
[1
,2
,3
]
Sweigert, Julia
[1
,2
]
Blake, Matthew
[1
,2
]
Douglass, Bradley
[4
]
Doane, Braden
[4
]
Reitz, Fredrick
[3
]
Larimer, Mary
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Radiol, Box 357115, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Integrated Brain Imaging Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Ctr Human Dev & Disabil, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Werc Shop, Bellevue, WA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源:
关键词:
addiction;
cannabis cues;
craving;
cue reactivity;
marijuana;
neuroimaging;
reward;
INCENTIVE-SENSITIZATION THEORY;
ALCOHOL-CONSUMPTION;
NEURAL ACTIVITY;
FOOD CUES;
REWARD;
ADDICTION;
REACTIVITY;
MODULATION;
SYSTEMS;
SMOKING;
D O I:
10.1002/brb3.1764
中图分类号:
B84 [心理学];
C [社会科学总论];
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号:
03 ;
0303 ;
030303 ;
04 ;
0402 ;
摘要:
Introduction The smell of cannabis is a cue with universal relevance to cannabis users. However, most cue reactivity imaging studies have solely utilized visual images, auditory imagery scripts, or tactile cues in their experiments. This study introduces a multimodal cue reactivity paradigm that includes picture, odor, and bimodal picture + odor cues. Methods Twenty-eight adults at risk for cannabis use disorder (CUD; defined as at least weekly use and Substance Involvement Score of >= 4 on the Cannabis sub-test of the Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test) and 26 cannabis-naive controls were exposed to cannabis and floral cues during event-related fMRI. Between-group differences in fMRI activation and correlations were tested using FMRIB's Local Analyses of Mixed Effects and corrected for multiple comparisons using a voxelwise threshold ofz > 2.3 and a corrected cluster threshold ofp Both visual and olfactory modalities resulted in significant activation of craving and reward systems, with cannabis odor cues eliciting a significantly greater response in regions mediating anticipation and reward (nucleus accumbens, pallidum, putamen, and anterior insular cortex, supplementary motor area, angular gyrus and superior frontal gyrus) and cannabis picture cues eliciting a significantly greater response in the occipital cortex and amygdala. Furthermore, the CUD group showed significantly increased activation in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), the insula, and the pallidum compared to controls. Within the CUD group, activation in the insula, anterior cingulate, and occipital cortex to bimodal cannabis cues was significantly correlated with self-reported craving. Conclusion Our multimodal cue reactivity paradigm is sensitive to neural adaptations associated with problematic cannabis use.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文