Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 inactivated vaccine: A meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Xiaoming [1 ]
Yang, Xia [2 ]
Ning, Zong [2 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Sch Grad Studies, Dept Gen Practice, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Liated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Practice, Nanning, Peoples R China
关键词
COVID-19; vaccine; efficacy; adverse event; meta-analysis; IMMUNOGENICITY; PANCREATITIS; BLIND;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.1015184
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Inactivated vaccine is one of the primary technology types of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which has wide application in many countries, including mainland China. However, systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines remains limited. And trust in the vaccine is the key to solving vaccine hesitancy. Methods Various academic databases were searched comprehensively for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to COVID-19 inactivated vaccines. The deadline for retrieval was December 2021. Study screening and data extraction were according to inclusive and exclusive criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.3 version and STATA software 16.0 version. Results Eight studies with 79,334 subjects were included of which 48,123 had received two doses of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines, and 31,211 had received two doses of placebo. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: in terms of effectiveness evaluation, two doses of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines decreased the symptomatic infection [relative risk (RR) = 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.18,0.30), P < 0.00001], asymptomatic infection [RR = 0.48, 95%CI (0.32, 0.74), P = 0.0008], total infection [RR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.24, 0.41), P < 0.00001] and hospitalization [RR = 0.06, 95%CI (0.01, 0.27), P = 0.0002] for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) significantly. In terms of safety assessment, two doses of COVID-19 inactivated vaccines also caused more adverse events. After two inoculations, total adverse events and systemic adverse events increased significantly [total adverse events RR = 1.14, 95%CI (1.08, 1.21), P < 0.00001; systemic adverse events RR = 1.22, 95%CI (1.09, 1.35), P = 0.0002]. The most common adverse event was pain at the injection site. Almost all local adverse reactions consisted of these events. The incidence of pain at the injection site was related to adjuvants. Using aluminum hydroxide as an adjuvant increased local pain significantly [RR = 1.97, 95%CI (1.52, 2.55), P < 0.00001]. Two doses COVID-19 inactivated vaccines did not increase serious adverse events [RR = 0.71, 95%CI (0.57, 0.90), P = 0.004]. Conclusion Two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines in people over 18 years of age effectively prevented SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated hospitalizations. Short-term, mild to moderate adverse reactions had occurred, but serious adverse events were rare. No placebo or vaccine-related deaths had been reported. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: 42021291250.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in children and/or adolescents:A meta-analysis
    Xu, Wencheng
    Tang, Jiake
    Chen, Chen
    Wang, Chunyi
    Wen, Wen
    Cheng, Yongran
    Zhou, Mengyun
    Wu, Qi
    Zhang, Xingwei
    Feng, Zhanhui
    Wang, Mingwei
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2022, 84 (05) : 727 - 729
  • [2] Efficacy and safety of Paxlovid for COVID-19:a meta-analysis
    Zheng, Qian
    Ma, Pengfei
    Wang, Mingwei
    Cheng, Yongran
    Zhou, Mengyun
    Ye, Lan
    Feng, Zhanhui
    Zhang, Chunlin
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2023, 86 (01) : 95 - 97
  • [3] Safety of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with epilepsy: a meta-analysis
    Qian Zheng
    Pengfei Ma
    Zhanhui Feng
    Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 13 - 17
  • [4] Safety of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with epilepsy: a meta-analysis
    Zheng, Qian
    Ma, Pengfei
    Feng, Zhanhui
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 44 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [5] Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines: A network meta-analysis
    Toubasi, Ahmad A.
    Al-Sayegh, Thuraya N.
    Obaid, Yazan Y.
    Al-Harasis, Sarah M.
    AlRyalat, Saif Aldeen S.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (03) : 245 - 262
  • [6] Efficacy and safety outcomes with remdesivir in COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis
    Tejas Kamleshbhai Patel
    Parvati B Patel
    Manish Barvaliya
    Vijayalaxmi
    Hira Lal Bhalla
    World Journal of Meta-Analysis, 2021, 9 (01) : 74 - 87
  • [7] A meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of immunomodulators in the treatment of severe COVID-19
    Ju, Xuegui
    Li, Jiayao
    Huang, Haonan
    Qing, Yidan
    Sandeep, Bhushan
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2025, 53 (03)
  • [8] Evaluation of the Treatment Efficacy and Safety of Remdesivir for COVID-19: a Meta-analysis
    Jun Tao
    Rebecca Aristotelidis
    Alexandra Zanowick-Marr
    Laura C. Chambers
    James McDonald
    Eleftherios E. Mylonakis
    Philip A. Chan
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2021, 3 (12) : 2443 - 2454
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of ivermectin for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alok Singh
    Pranav G Sheth
    Suryaprakash Dhaneria
    Dhyuti Gupta
    Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, 2021, (10) : 440 - 450
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of antivirals for Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Prasad, Manya
    Elavarasi, Arunmozhimaran
    Madan, Karan
    Nischal, Neeraj
    Soneja, Manish
    Seth, Tulika
    Sahoo, Ranjit Kumar
    Sharma, Atul
    Garg, Pramod
    Shalimar
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2020, 33 (04): : 222 - +