共 50 条
Evaluation of Enzyme Immunoassays to Detect Clostridium difficile Toxin From Anaerobic Stool Culture
被引:26
|作者:
She, Rosemary C.
[1
]
Durrant, Robert J.
[3
]
Petti, Cathy A.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Associated Reg & Univ Pathologists Labs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词:
Clostridium difficile;
Enzyme immunoassay;
Cytotoxin;
Stool culture;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MULTICENTER EVALUATION;
CYTOTOXIN ASSAY;
DIARRHEA;
ANTIGEN;
TESTS;
D O I:
10.1309/AJCPMM2E7VSPHNPG
中图分类号:
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号:
100104 ;
摘要:
Stool culture for Clostridium difficile, while necessary for strain typing and antimicrobial surveillance, cannot determine toxin production. We prospectively tested in triplicate 91 C difficile cultured isolates for toxin production by 2 enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Meridian Premier Toxins A&B, Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH; and TechLab Tox A/B II, TechLab, Blacksburg, VA) and cytotoxin neutralization bioassay (CTN). By CTN, 88% (80/91) were toxigenic. Reproducibility was 93% (85/91) for CTN, 80% (73/91) for Meridian EIA, and 79% (72/91)for TechLab EIA. Compared with CTN, sensitivities were 87.1% and 89.2% for the Meridian and TechLab EIAs, respectively. In an additional 115 stool specimens, CTN detected toxin more frequently from cultured isolates (96/115) than stool (84/115). For C difficile toxin detection from isolates, EIA was less reproducible than CTN. EIA methods can be falsely negative in 10% to 12% of isolates, and these should be tested by CTN or polymerase chain reaction. When positive, EIA is fast and reliable for detecting C difficile toxin from culture.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 84
页数:4
相关论文