Double moral hazard in a supply chain with consumer learning

被引:21
|
作者
Zhou, Jianheng [1 ]
Zhao, Xia [2 ]
Xue, Ling [3 ]
Gargeya, Vidyaranya [2 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Glorious Sun Sch Business & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ N Carolina Greensboro, Bryan Sch Business & Econ, Greensboro, NC 27411 USA
[3] Univ Memphis, Fogelman Coll Business & Econ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Supply chain; Moral hazard; Consumer learning; Information sharing; CONTRACTS; COORDINATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.011
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
When an innovative product is introduced into the market, consumers are often uncertain about the product value. Over time they may learn the value of product. This paper studies the impact of consumer learning on the firms' marketing efforts and revenue sharing strategies in a supply chain that sells an innovative product to consumers over multiple periods. Both the supplier and the retailer can exert marketing efforts to influence consumers' beliefs about the product and improve the product demand. Because the supplier and the retailer are independent entities with self-interested objectives, double moral hazard exists in the supply chain. We find that the supplier and retailer exert more marketing efforts in the presence of consumer learning but the marketing efforts decrease as consumers learn more about the product. We also examine the revenue-sharing strategies and find that supplier shares more revenue to the retailer when they cooperate for a longer time horizon. The total profit of the supply chain may be higher when there is information asymmetry between the supplier and retailer. This finding suggests that information sharing is not always beneficial to improve supply chain coordination. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 495
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOUBLE MORAL HAZARD IN SUPPLY CHAIN BASED ON OVERCONFIDENCE BIAS
    Kang, Wanglin
    Liu, Xinmin
    Li, Zhipeng
    LISS 2011: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS, INFORMATICS AND SERVICE SCIENCE, VOL 2, 2011, : 272 - 275
  • [2] The value of supply chain coordination under moral hazard: A case study of the consumer product supply chain
    Lee, Yumi
    Song, Sang Hwa
    Cheong, Taesu
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [3] The supply chain incentive contract under double moral-hazard
    Li, Shanliang
    Wang, Chunhua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND SYSTEM DYNAMICS: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND COMPLEX SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-10, 2007, : 1177 - 1181
  • [4] On Pareto-efficient contract with double moral hazard in supply chain
    Zhang, Bo
    Huang, Pei-Qing
    Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2007, 41 (12): : 2001 - 2005
  • [5] Bargaining Power Choices with Moral Hazard in a Supply Chain
    Guo, Hongmei
    Gu, Shuiliang
    Su, Yingsheng
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 2018
  • [6] Incentive contracts research of information security outsourcing for complementary firms in supply chain under double moral hazard
    Wu Y.
    Wang L.
    Feng G.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2022, 42 (11): : 2916 - 2926
  • [7] Incentive contracts of knowledge investment for cooperative innovation in project-based supply chain with double moral hazard
    Yin-zhong Chen
    Wei Chen
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 2693 - 2702
  • [8] Incentive contracts of knowledge investment for cooperative innovation in project-based supply chain with double moral hazard
    Chen, Yin-zhong
    Chen, Wei
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (04) : 2693 - 2702
  • [9] Supply Chain Contract Designing with Moral Hazard Based on Screening Model
    Ma, Weimin
    Li, Chao
    ICICTA: 2009 SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, VOL III, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 997 - 1000
  • [10] Incentive mechanism to prevent moral hazard in online supply chain finance
    Qiang Lin
    Ying Peng
    Electronic Commerce Research, 2021, 21 : 571 - 598