Immunological and clinical factors associated with adverse systemic reactions during the build-up phase of honeybee venom immunotherapy

被引:36
|
作者
Korosec, P. [1 ]
Ziberna, K. [1 ]
Silar, M. [1 ]
Dezman, M. [1 ]
Smodis, N. Celesnik [1 ]
Rijavec, M. [1 ]
Kopac, P. [1 ]
Erzen, R. [1 ]
Lalek, N. [1 ]
Bajrovic, N. [1 ]
Kosnik, M. [1 ]
Zidarn, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clin Resp & Allerg Dis, Golnik 4204, Slovenia
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY | 2015年 / 45卷 / 10期
关键词
adverse systemic reactions; basophils; CD63; honeybee venom allergy; IgE; immunotherapy; risk factors; ALLERGEN THRESHOLD-SENSITIVITY; BASOPHIL ACTIVATION; HYMENOPTERA VENOM; SAFETY; DIAGNOSIS; EFFICACY; BEE; ANAPHYLAXIS; INDUCTION; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1111/cea.12582
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Adverse systemic reactions (SRs) are more common in honeybee venom immunotherapy (VIT) than in wasp VIT. Factors that might be associated with SRs during the honeybee VIT are poorly understood. Objective Our aim was to evaluate risk factors for SRs during the build-up phase of honeybee venom immunotherapy. Methods We included 93 patients who underwent ultra-rush honeybee VIT. The adverse SRs and their severity was compared to various immunological (sIgE, tIgE, basophil CD63 response, baseline tryptase, and skin tests), patient-specific (age, sex, cardiovascular conditions and medications, and other allergic diseases), and sting-specific factors (anaphylaxis severity, time interval to onset of symptoms, and absence of cutaneous symptoms). Results Twenty-three patients (24.7%) experienced mild SRs and 13 patients (14%) severe SRs. In five patients with severe SRs, the build-up was stopped. High basophil allergen sensitivity, evaluated as dose-response curve metrics of EC15, EC50, CD-sens, AUC, or the response to submaximal 0.01 mu g/mL of venom concentration, was the most significant risk factor and only independent predictor of severe SRs and/or build-up stop. Time interval of < 5 min after sting to onset of symptoms and lower specific IgEs to rApi m1 was also associated with severe SRs. There was no difference in other immunological, patient-specific, or sting-specific factors, including the baseline tryptase. None of the studied factors was associated with mild SRs. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance High basophil allergen CD63 sensitivity phenotype was a major indicator of severe adverse SRs during the build-up phase of honeybee VIT. Possibly role was also showed for short latency to filed sting reaction and low sIgE to rApi m1. Before honeybee VIT, measurement of basophil allergen sensitivity should be used to identify patients with a high risk for severe side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:1579 / 1589
页数:11
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Factors associated with side effects during the build-up phase of honeybee venom immunotherapy
    Korosec, P.
    Ziberna, K.
    Silar, M.
    Dezman, M.
    Celesnik, Smodis N.
    Erzen, R.
    Bajrovic, N.
    Zidarn, M.
    Kosnik, M.
    ALLERGY, 2014, 69 : 24 - 25
  • [2] Adverse allergic reactions during build-up phase of milk oral immunotherapy
    Jaqueti Moreno, P.
    Vazquez Cortes, S.
    Serrano Garcia, I
    Chaparro Briones, P.
    Cerecedo Carballo, I
    Cimarra Alvarez-Lovell, M.
    Freundt Serpa, N. P.
    Fuentes Aparicio, V
    Gonzalez Gutierrez, M. L.
    Sanchez Morillas, L.
    Robledo Echarren, T.
    Rodriguez Alvarez, M.
    Fernandez Rivas, M.
    ALLERGY, 2019, 74 : 359 - 359
  • [3] Safety and tolerability during build-up phase of a rush venom immunotherapy
    Bernkopf, Kathleen
    Roensch, Henriette
    Spornraft-Ragaller, Petra
    Neumeister, Volker
    Bauer, Andrea
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 116 (04) : 360 - 365
  • [4] Trends in Adverse Reactions Requiring Epinephrine in the Build-up Phase of Oral Immunotherapy
    Noshirvan, Arram
    Petroni, Daniel H.
    Tsai, Mindy
    Galli, Stephen J.
    Chinthrajah, R. Sharon
    Nadeau, Kari C.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 137 (02) : AB131 - AB131
  • [5] Severity of allergic reactions during build-up phase of milk oral immunotherapy
    Gomez Garcia, I
    Jaqueti, P.
    Vazquez, S.
    Serrano, I
    Cerecedo, I
    Cimarra, M.
    Gonzalez Gutierrez, M. L.
    Sanchez Morillas, L.
    Robledo, T.
    Fernandez-Rivas, M.
    ALLERGY, 2019, 74 : 357 - 358
  • [6] Use of tryptase levels to detect adverse reactions during honeybee venom immunotherapy
    Vega, A.
    Alvarez-Twose, I
    Cardenas, R.
    Alonso, A. M.
    Beitia, J. M.
    Mateo, M. B.
    ALLERGY, 2016, 71 : 179 - 180
  • [7] Venom immunotherapy: safety and tolerability of the build-up phase with depot versus aqueous preparations
    Valerio, Pravettoni
    Marina, Mauro
    Federica, Rivolta
    Dario, Consonni
    Camilla, Cappelletti
    Alessandra, Chiei Gallo
    Andrea, Sangalli
    Maria, Bilo Beatrice
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2022, 52 (10): : 1230 - 1233
  • [8] Anaphylactic reactions in the build-up phase of rush immunotherapy for bee venom allergy in pediatric patients: a single-center experience
    Glaeser A.
    Müller C.
    Bode S.
    Clinical and Molecular Allergy, 20 (1)
  • [9] Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors do not impair the safety of Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy build-up phase
    Stoevesandt, J.
    Hain, J.
    Stolze, I.
    Kerstan, A.
    Trautmann, A.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2014, 44 (05): : 747 - 755
  • [10] Biomarkers of the Severity of Honeybee Sting Reactions and the Severity and Threshold of Systemic Adverse Events During Immunotherapy
    Kopac, Peter
    Custovic, Adnan
    Zidarn, Mihaela
    Silar, Mira
    Selb, Julij
    Bajrovic, Nissera
    Erzen, Renato
    Kosnik, Mitja
    Korosec, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2021, 9 (08): : 3157 - +