Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study

被引:31
|
作者
Chen, Tianyu [1 ]
Yu, Fang [1 ]
Lin, Huayou [1 ]
Zhao, Yinying [1 ]
Chang, Pingjun [1 ]
Lin, Lei [1 ]
Chen, Qi [1 ]
Zheng, Qian [1 ]
Zhao, Yun-e [1 ]
Lu, Fan [1 ]
Li, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Med Univ, Hosp Eye, Dept Cataract, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Clinical Trial; Optics and Refraction; Lens and zonules; DOUBLE-PASS SYSTEM; LASER VISION CORRECTION; PSEUDOPHAKIC EYES; IMAGE QUALITY; CHROMATIC ABERRATIONS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CATARACT-SURGERY; LIGHT SCATTER; PERFORMANCE; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307135
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Background and aims To evaluate the objective and subjective optical quality of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods Fifty patients (50 eyes) having phacoemulsification and IOL implantation surgery were enrolled. 25 patients were implanted with all optic zone diffractive multifocal IOL and 25 patients with monofocal IOL. Objective optical quality parameters under 4mm pupil using Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS), subjective visual acuity (VA) at 85cd/m(2) luminance and questionnaire concerning halo and visual function were assessed. Results The multifocal group gained similar objective optical outcomes, such as OQAS values at contrast 100%, 20%, 9%, modulation transfer function cut-off and Strehl ratio, as the monofocal group. Objective scatter index (OSI) was significantly better in the monofocal group. Distance corrected near VA, uncorrected near VA, distance corrected intermediate VA and uncorrected intermediate VA were significantly better in the multifocal group. The difference in uncorrected distance VA and best corrected distance VA between the monofocal and multifocal groups was not significant. Mild halos and glare were reported in both groups and a significant difference between the two groups was not observed; however, moderate glare and halos were reported only in the multifocal group (2/25). There was no significant difference between the two groups when visual function was compared. Conclusions All optic zone diffractive multifocal IOLs provided almost the same objective optical quality as monofocal IOLs did under 4mm pupil besides good all distance visual performance, but with greater OSI, indicating that implantation provides good optical quality in daytime but with more intraocular scatter light. Trial registration number NCT02234635, post-results.
引用
收藏
页码:1530 / 1535
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses
    Gundersen, Kjell Gunnar
    Potvin, Rick
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 10 : 805 - 811
  • [2] Visual Outcomes, Quality of Vision, and Quality of Life of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation after Myopic Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Prospective, Observational Case Series
    Chang, John S. M.
    Ng, Jack C. M.
    Chan, Vincent K. C.
    Law, Antony K. P.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017
  • [3] Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters
    Walkow, T
    Klemen, UM
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 239 (09) : 683 - 687
  • [4] Patient satisfaction after implantation of diffractive designed multifocal intraocular lenses in dependence on objective parameters
    Tony Walkow
    Ulrich M. Klemen
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2001, 239 : 683 - 687
  • [5] Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison
    Ye, Pan-Pan
    Li, Xia
    Yao, Ke
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 6 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [6] Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison
    Pan-Pan Ye
    Xia Li
    Ke Yao
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, (03) : 300 - 306
  • [7] Prospective study of bilateral mix-and-match implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in Koreans
    Chan Min Yang
    Dong Hui Lim
    Sungsoon Hwang
    Joo Hyun
    Tae-Young Chung
    BMC Ophthalmology, 18
  • [8] Prospective study of bilateral mix-and-match implantation of diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in Koreans
    Yang, Chan Min
    Lim, Dong Hui
    Hwang, Sungsoon
    Hyun, Joo
    Chung, Tae-Young
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [9] Prospective Assessment of Binocular Visual Outcomes after Staged Implantation of Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with Three Near Additional Powers
    Ota, Yuka
    Nakamura, Kunihiko
    Yaguchi, Saori
    Hirasawa, Manabu
    Minami, Keiichiro
    Bissen-Miyajima, Hiroko
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [10] Visual outcomes and optical quality after implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens
    Chen, Xiangfei
    Zhao, Ming
    Shi, Yuhua
    Yang, Liping
    Lu, Yan
    Huang, Zhenping
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 64 (04) : 285 - 291