Global social media vs local values: Private international law should protect local consumer rights by using the public policy exception?
被引:0
|
作者:
Hornle, Julia
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Commercial Law Studies, 67-69 Lincolns Inn Fields, London WC2A 3JB, EnglandQueen Mary Univ London, Ctr Commercial Law Studies, 67-69 Lincolns Inn Fields, London WC2A 3JB, England
Hornle, Julia
[1
]
机构:
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Commercial Law Studies, 67-69 Lincolns Inn Fields, London WC2A 3JB, England
Social media;
Privacy claims;
Private international law;
Jurisdiction clauses;
Choice of law clauses;
Contract;
Public policy;
Internet;
D O I:
10.1016/j.clsr.2017.08.008
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
This article focuses on the relationship between forum selection clauses, choice of law clauses and data protection and privacy protection. In particular, it discusses the question whether and why jurisdiction and choice of law clauses used in the terms of social media providers should not be enforced against social media users located in a different jurisdiction. The article distinguishes between the contractual, private law analysis and the application of public policy as part of the private international law analysis. The contract law analysis is centred on doctrines such as unconscionability, which in turn examines issue such as fairness and overwhelming bargaining power of one party. By contrast, the public policy analysis in private international law focuses on fundamental rights, legality of contractual clauses according to the local law of the forum and the interests of justice. It is argued here that both aspects (contractual and public policy doctrines) are paramount for achieving not only justice between the parties of a dispute but also ensuring good administration of justice in the public interest. (C) 2017 Julia Hornle. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.