Response of wheat (Tritium aestivum) to low rates of glyphosate and glufosinate

被引:3
|
作者
Davis, Brad [1 ]
Scott, Robert C. [1 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [1 ]
Gbur, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72704 USA
关键词
Crop sensitivity to herbicides; Glufosinate; Glyphosate; Spray drift; Wheat; RICE ORYZA-SATIVA; SIMULATED DRIFT; WEED SEEDS; DORMANCY; CORN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2013.07.018
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Field studies were conducted in 2007 and 2008 at Hamilton Farms near Lonoke, Arkansas, USA to evaluate the potential impact of sub-lethal doses of glyphosate and glufosinate on winter wheat (Tritium aestivum). Three wheat cultivars were seeded, and glyphosate and glufosinate were applied at 1/10 and 1/20 times the labeled dose at the 3- to 4-leaf, panicle initiation, and boot stages. Both herbicides caused significant injury to wheat; however, wheat response to both herbicides was different. Glufosinate injury occurred rapidly and consisted of mainly leaf necrosis. Glyphosate injury to wheat was minimal and manifested in the form of leaf yellowing. Glyphosate caused shortened flag leaf when applied at PI and reduced canopy height when applied at boot. Injury was minimal to wheat across all treatments, with the highest level of injury being 34% following glufosinate applied at boot. Conversely, wheat was most sensitive to glyphosate at the 3- to 4-leaf stage. Flag leaf length was reduced the greatest by glyphosate at PI, whereas glufosinate reduced flag leaf length minimally. Even though glyphosate injury was lower than that of glufosinate, yield was reduced more by glyphosate. Wheat seed weight and germination were not affected by either herbicide. Wheat appears to be slightly more sensitive to glyphosate with respect to yield; however, it is slightly more sensitive to glufosinate with respect to foliar injury. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 184
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Response of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Low Rates of Glyphosate and Glufosinate
    Davis, Brad
    Scott, Robert C.
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Gbur, Edward
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 25 (02) : 198 - 203
  • [2] Response of grain sorghum to low rates of glufosinate and nicosulfuron
    Bowman, Hunter D.
    Barber, Tom
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Roberts, Trenton L.
    Kelley, Jason
    Gbur, Edward E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) : 338 - 342
  • [3] RESPONSE OF IMIDAZOLINONE-RESISTANT SUNFLOWER TO VARIOUS DRIFT RATES OF GLYPHOSATE, GLUFOSINATE AND INDAZIFLAM
    Serim, Ahmet Tansel
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2022, 39
  • [4] Circadian response of annual weeds to glyphosate and glufosinate
    Martinson, KB
    Sothern, RB
    Koukkari, WL
    Durgan, BR
    Gunsolus, JL
    CHRONOBIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 19 (02) : 405 - 422
  • [5] Response of annual weed species to glufosinate and glyphosate
    Tharp, BE
    Schabenberger, O
    Kells, JJ
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (03) : 542 - 547
  • [7] Response of non-glufosinate-resistant cotton to reduced rates of glufosinate
    Miller, DK
    Downer, RG
    Leonard, BR
    Holman, EM
    Kelly, ST
    WEED SCIENCE, 2003, 51 (05) : 781 - 785
  • [8] Selective weed control with glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)
    Blackshaw, RE
    Harker, KN
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) : 885 - 892
  • [9] Sensitivity and Recovery of Grain Sorghum to Simulated Drift Rates of Glyphosate, Glufosinate, and Paraquat
    Hale, Ralph R.
    Bararpour, Taghi
    Kaur, Gurpreet
    Seale, John W.
    Singh, Bhupinder
    Wilkerson, Tessie
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2019, 9 (04):
  • [10] Response of Rice to Drift Rates of Glyphosate Applied at Low Carrier Volumes
    Hensley, Justin B.
    Webster, Eric P.
    Blouin, David C.
    Harrell, Dustin L.
    Bond, Jason A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (02) : 257 - 262