Explaining cross-country variation in collective action in the digital era

被引:4
|
作者
Jenkins, Matthew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
Collective action; social networks; east asia; POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION; NETWORK HETEROGENEITY; MEDIATION MODEL; SOCIAL NETWORKS; CONSEQUENCES; CONTEXT; COMMUNICATION; DISAGREEMENT; AMBIVALENCE; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1080/19331681.2019.1572567
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The digital era has ushered in a new collective action landscape that scholars are now trying to understand. To date, scholars have assumed homogeneity in the effect of ICT (information and communications technology) on collective action. In this article, I show that the effect of ICT on collective action is heterogeneous, and that it is sensitive to national and cultural context by conducting a cross-case comparison of Japan and South Korea. These two countries present a particularly illuminating pair of cases, with Korea showing consistently high levels of collective action and Japan showing consistently low levels of collective action despite the introduction and diffusion of ICT. I argue that this participation gap is in part due to differences in the way social network dynamics operate in the two countries. I show that social network size is more strongly associated with participation in protests, boycotts, and petitions (PBP) in Korea. Additionally, I find that social network heterogeneity has a positive association with participation in political groups in Korea, whereas the two variables have a negative association in Japan. I conclude by discussing the broader implications for our understanding of the relationship between collective action, social networks, and culture.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring and Explaining Cross-Country Immigration Policies
    Rayp, Glenn
    Ruyssen, Ilse
    Standaert, Samuel
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 95 : 141 - 163
  • [2] Cross-country variation in connection to nature
    Soga, Masashi
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    ONE EARTH, 2025, 8 (02):
  • [3] CROSS-COUNTRY VARIATION IN THE QUALITY OF CONSUMPTION
    SUHM, FE
    THEIL, H
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1979, 3 (04) : 391 - 395
  • [4] Cross-country adoption: A call to action
    D'Amato, A
    NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW, 1998, 73 (05) : 1239 - 1249
  • [5] Explaining Toothbrushing behaviour -: a cross-country study.
    Honkala, S
    Honkala, E
    Tynjälä, J
    Kannas, L
    Åstrom, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : 625 - 625
  • [6] Explaining Cross-Country Productivity Differences in Retail Trade
    Lagakos, David
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2016, 124 (02) : 579 - 620
  • [7] Explaining cross-country differences in policy response to child labour
    Dessy, SE
    Vencatachellum, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2003, 36 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [8] Explaining cross-country differences in participation rates and aggregate fluctuations
    Conesa, JC
    Díaz-Moreno, C
    Galdón-Sánchez, JE
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2002, 26 (02): : 333 - 345
  • [9] Cross-country digital EEG survey 1998
    Brenner, RP
    Scheuer, ML
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 15 (06) : 485 - 488
  • [10] A cross-country comparision of the issuance of Digital Signatures
    Srivastava, Aashish
    Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of Asia Pacific Decision Sciences Institute: INNOVATION & SERVICE EXCELLENCE FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, : 178 - 181