Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics

被引:295
作者
Chen, R
Weng, ZP
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Bioinformat Program, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/prot.10092
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A comprehensive docking study was performed on 27 distinct protein-protein complexes. For 13 test systems, docking was performed with the unbound X-ray structures of both the receptor and the ligand. For the remaining systems, the unbound X-ray structure of only molecule was available; therefore the bound structure for the other molecule was used. Our method optimizes desolvation, shape complementarity, and electrostatics using a Fast Fourier Transform algorithm. A global search in the rotational and translational space without any knowledge of the binding sites was performed for all proteins except nine antibodies recognizing antigens. For these antibodies, we docked their well-characterized binding site-the complementarity-determining region defined without information of the antigen-to the entire surface of the antigen. For 24 systems, we were able to find near-native ligand orientations (interface C. root mean square deviation less than 2.5 Angstrom from the crystal complex) among the top 2,000 choices. For three systems, our algorithm could identify the correct complex structure unambiguously. For 13 other complexes, we either ranked a near-native structure in the top 20 or obtained 20 or more near-native structures in the top 2,000 or both. The key feature of our algorithm is the use of target functions that are highly tolerant to conformational changes upon binding. If combined with a post-processing method, our algorithm may provide a general solution to the unbound docking problem. Our program, called ZDOCK, is freely available to academic users (http://zlab.bu.edu/-rong/dock/). (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 294
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Estimation and filtering of potential protein-protein docking positions [J].
Ackermann, F ;
Herrmann, G ;
Posch, S ;
Sagerer, G .
BIOINFORMATICS, 1998, 14 (02) :196-205
[2]   The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[3]   An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking [J].
Betts, MJ ;
Sternberg, MJE .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1999, 12 (04) :271-283
[4]   CHARMM - A PROGRAM FOR MACROMOLECULAR ENERGY, MINIMIZATION, AND DYNAMICS CALCULATIONS [J].
BROOKS, BR ;
BRUCCOLERI, RE ;
OLAFSON, BD ;
STATES, DJ ;
SWAMINATHAN, S ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 4 (02) :187-217
[5]   Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project [J].
Burley, SK ;
Almo, SC ;
Bonanno, JB ;
Capel, M ;
Chance, MR ;
Gaasterland, T ;
Lin, DW ;
Sali, A ;
Studier, FW ;
Swaminathan, S .
NATURE GENETICS, 1999, 23 (02) :151-157
[6]   Protein docking along smooth association pathways [J].
Camacho, CJ ;
Vajda, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2001, 98 (19) :10636-10641
[7]  
Camacho CJ, 2000, PROTEINS, V40, P525, DOI 10.1002/1097-0134(20000815)40:3<525::AID-PROT190>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-F
[9]   PROTEIN DOCKING ALGORITHMS - SIMULATING MOLECULAR RECOGNITION [J].
CHERFILS, J ;
JANIN, J .
CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 1993, 3 (02) :265-269
[10]  
Dixon JS, 1997, PROTEINS, P198