Evaluating and Improving Questions on an Unproctored Online General Chemistry Exam

被引:6
|
作者
Clark, Ted M. [1 ]
Turner, Daniel A. [1 ]
Rostam, Darian C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
General Public; First-Year Undergraduate; General; Distance Learning; Self Instruction; Testing; Assessment; CONCEPT INVENTORY; PSYCHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; STUDENTS; ENVIRONMENT; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00603
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Administering exams in large enrollment courses is challenging and systems in place for accomplishing this task were upended in the spring of 2020 when a sudden transformation to online instruction and testing occurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the following year, when courses remained online, approaches to improve exam security included measures like using test banks and reducing the allotted time for completing exams to reduce the sharing of information. A psychometric comparison using classical test theory of an unproctored online exam with one delivered in-person indicates both have comparable reliability. However, item-level analysis demonstrates some questions performed higher in the unproctored setting, with an important variable being the item's searchability online. Revising questions to increase generalizability and reduce searchability mitigate these performance differences. Further, changing the format for questions involving calculations from multiple-choice to open response with random number generation was found to increase difficulty and item discrimination and is a viable approach for improving exam security.
引用
收藏
页码:3510 / 3521
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing the First Online General Chemistry Laboratory Exam
    Reeves, Jimmy H.
    Exton, Deborah
    INNOVATIVE USES OF ASSESSMENTS FOR TEACHING AND RESEARCH, 2014, 1182 : 181 - 191
  • [2] Investigating the Use of an Artificial Intelligence Chatbot with General Chemistry Exam Questions
    Clark, Ted M.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 100 (05) : 1905 - 1916
  • [3] Cheating on Unproctored Online Exams: Prevalence, Mitigation Measures, and Effects on Exam Performance
    Pleasants, Jacob
    Pleasants, John M.
    Pleasants, Barbara P.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2022, 26 (01): : 268 - 284
  • [4] Use of the Online Version of an ACS General Chemistry Exam: Evaluation of Student Performance and Impact on the Final Exam
    Elkins, Kelly M.
    Murphy, Kristen L.
    TECHNOLOGY AND ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING IN CHEMISTRY, 2016, 1235 : 211 - 223
  • [5] Effect of online exam review session video format on student exam performance in general chemistry courses
    Alanazi, Amal
    King, Daniel
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 257
  • [6] Evaluating proof blocks problems as exam questions
    Poulsen S.
    Viswanathan M.
    Herman G.L.
    West M.
    ACM Inroads, 2022, 13 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [7] Evaluating Proof Blocks Problems as Exam Questions
    Poulsen, Seth
    Viswanathan, Mahesh
    Herman, Geoffrey L.
    West, Matthew
    ICER 2021: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ACM CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2021, : 157 - 168
  • [8] Proctored Versus Unproctored Online Exams: Studying the Impact of Exam Environment on Student Performance
    Hollister, Kimberly K.
    Berenson, Mark L.
    DECISION SCIENCES-JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE EDUCATION, 2009, 7 (01) : 271 - 294
  • [9] Evaluating Micro Parsons Problems as Exam Questions
    Wu, Zihan
    Smith, David H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CONFERENCE INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, VOL 1, ITICSE 2024, 2024, : 674 - 680
  • [10] ANOTHER GENERAL CHEMISTRY PLACEMENT EXAM AND GENERAL CHEMISTRY PROGRAM
    WHITTEN, KW
    BROWN, RD
    WILLIAMS, GC
    MICKLER, JE
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1969, (APR): : CH41 - &