Theory of mind and wisdom: The development of different forms of perspective-taking in late adulthood

被引:21
|
作者
Rakoczy, Hannes [1 ]
Wandt, Raphaela [1 ,2 ]
Thomas, Stefanie [2 ]
Nowak, Jana [2 ]
Kunzmann, Ute [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Psychol, Waldweg 26, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Inst Psychol, Leipzig, Germany
关键词
theory of mind; ageing; wisdom; social cognition; perspective-taking; AGE-DIFFERENCES; PROCESSING-SPEED; TASK; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; OLDER; INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1111/bjop.12246
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does perspective-taking develop over the lifespan? This question has been investigated in two separate research traditions, dealing with theory of mind (ToM) and wisdom, respectively. Operating in almost complete isolation from each other, and using rather different conceptual approaches, these two traditions have produced seemingly contradictory results: While perspective-taking has been consistently found to decline in old age in ToM research, studies on wisdom have mostly found that perspective-taking remains constant or sometimes even increases in later adulthood. This study sought to integrate these two lines of research and clarify the seemingly contradictory patterns of findings by systematically testing for both forms of perspective-taking and their potential cognitive foundations. The results revealed (1) the dissociation in developmental patterns between ToM perspective-taking (declining with age) and wisdom-related perspective-taking (no decline with age) also held - documented here for the first time - in one and the same sample of younger versus older adults; (2) this dissociation was of limited generality: It did not (or only partly) hold once the material of the two types of tasks was more closely matched; and (3) the divergent developmental patterns of ToM perspective-taking versus wisdom-related perspective-taking could be accounted for to some degree by the fact that only TOM perspective-taking was related to developmental changes in fluid intelligence.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 24
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The closing of the theory of mind: A critique of perspective-taking
    Geoff G. Cole
    Abbie C. Millett
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2019, 26 : 1787 - 1802
  • [2] The closing of the theory of mind: A critique of perspective-taking
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Millett, Abbie C.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2019, 26 (06) : 1787 - 1802
  • [3] Theory of mind in dogs: is the perspective-taking task a good test?
    William A. Roberts
    Krista Macpherson
    Learning & Behavior, 2011, 39 : 303 - 305
  • [4] Theory of mind in dogs: is the perspective-taking task a good test?
    Roberts, William A.
    Macpherson, Krista
    LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2011, 39 (04) : 303 - 305
  • [5] THEORY OF MIND IMPAIRMENT IN SCHIZOPHRENIA REFLECTS A DIFFICULTY IN PERSPECTIVE-TAKING
    Langdon, Robyn
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2010, 117 (2-3) : 403 - 403
  • [6] Two independent sources of difficulty in perspective-taking/theory of mind tasks
    Steven Samuel
    Geoff G. Cole
    Madeline J. Eacott
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2020, 27 : 1341 - 1347
  • [7] Two independent sources of difficulty in perspective-taking/theory of mind tasks
    Samuel, Steven
    Cole, Geoff G.
    Eacott, Madeline J.
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2020, 27 (06) : 1341 - 1347
  • [8] Keeping the reader's mind in mind: Development of perspective-taking in children's dictations
    Peskin, Joan
    Prusky, Carly
    Comay, Julie
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 35 (01) : 35 - 43
  • [9] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEORY OF MIND AND RELATIONAL FRAME THEORY: CONVERGENCE OF PERSPECTIVE-TAKING MEASURES
    Hendriks, Annemieke L.
    Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne
    McEnteggart, Ciara
    De Mey, Hubert R. A.
    Witteman, Cilia L. M.
    Janssen, Gwenny T. L.
    Egger, Jos I. M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2016, 13 (1-2): : 17 - 23
  • [10] THE ROLE OF PERSPECTIVE-TAKING ABILITY IN NEGOTIATING UNDER DIFFERENT FORMS OF ARBITRATION
    NEALE, MA
    BAZERMAN, MH
    INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1983, 36 (03): : 378 - 388