A comparison between the design methods for earth retaining structures recommended by BS 8002 - 1994 and previously used methods

被引:3
|
作者
Puller, M [1 ]
Lee, CKT [1 ]
机构
[1] HARRIS & SUTHERLAND,HONG KONG,HONG KONG
关键词
D O I
10.1680/igeng.1996.28133
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
In May 1994 the new Code of Practice for Earth Retaining Structures BS 8002(1) was published and replaced the original Code of Practice CP2 published in the 1950s, Revision of this Code to include improved knowledge of the performance of soils and methods of analysis had been long awaited, In 1984 CIRIA report 104 on the design of embedded retaining structures in stiff clays had provided designers with guidance at an interim stage, This Paper makes a brief comparison between the scope of each Code, BS 8002 and CP2, and makes a critical review of the methods of earth pressure calculation and wall design recommended by each of them.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 34
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative studies by calculation between design methods for embedded and braced retaining walls recommended by BS 8002 - 1994 and previously used methods
    Puller, M
    Lee, CKT
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 1996, 119 (01) : 35 - 48
  • [2] CALCULATION METHODS BASED ON NONLINEAR MODELS IN SOIL MECHANICS IN DESIGN OF EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURES
    Hulpus, Trifan-Alexandru
    QUALITY AND INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, : 447 - 452
  • [3] Comparison between monotype and hybrid earth retaining structures
    Eldiasty, Walaa A.
    Altahrany, Ayman I.
    Elmeligy, Mahmoud M.
    INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [4] Comparison between monotype and hybrid earth retaining structures
    Walaa A. Eldiasty
    Ayman I. Altahrany
    Mahmoud M. Elmeligy
    Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2019, 4
  • [6] COMPARISON OF METHODS USED FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES
    Cada, Petr
    Maca, Jiri
    NMM 2017 - NANO & MACRO MECHANICS 2017, 2017, 13 : 20 - 28
  • [7] A comparison of methods currently used in inclusive design
    Goodman-Deane, Joy
    Ward, James
    Hosking, Ian
    Clarkson, P. John
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2014, 45 (04) : 886 - 894
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SOME METHODS USED IN ROBUST DESIGN
    Jarosova, Eva
    Zimmermann, Pavel
    APLIMAT 2007 - 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, PT I, 2007, : 379 - 386
  • [9] BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION (BS) - A COMPARISON BETWEEN 4 DIFFERENT METHODS
    HOLGERSSON, M
    DREBORG, S
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1985, 55 (02): : 304 - 304
  • [10] Comparison of Two Currently used and One Proposed Seismic Design Methods for Steel Structures
    Karavasilis, Theodore L.
    Bazeos, Nikitas
    Beskos, Dimitri E.
    ENGINEERING AGAINST FRACTURE, 2009, : 477 - +