The attentional blink in typically developing and reading-disabled children

被引:5
|
作者
de Groot, Barry J. A. [1 ]
van den Bos, Kees P. [1 ]
van der Meulen, Bieuwe F. [1 ]
Minnaert, Alexander E. M. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Special Educ & Clin Educ Sci, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Word reading; Fluency; Reading disabilities; Dyslexia; Phonological awareness; Rapid automatized naming; Visual attention; Attentional blink; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; PHONOLOGICAL MEMORY DEFICITS; SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION; DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA; LANGUAGE IMPAIRMENT; DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; WORKING-MEMORY; SPAN DEFICIT; TERM-MEMORY; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.003
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study's research question was whether selective visual attention, and specifically the attentional blink (AB) as operationalized by a dual target rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task, can explain individual differences in word reading (WR) and reading-related phonological performances in typically developing children and reading-disabled subgroups. A total of 407 Dutch school children (Grades 3-6) were classified either as typically developing (n = 302) or as belonging to one of three reading-disabled subgroups: reading disabilities only (RD-only, n = 69), both RD and attention problems (RD+ADHD, n = 16), or both RD and a specific language impairment (RD+SLI, n = 20). The RSVP task employed alphanumeric stimuli that were presented in two blocks. Standardized Dutch tests were used to measure WR, phonemic awareness (PA), and alphanumeric rapid naming (RAN). Results indicate that, controlling for PA and RAN performance, general RSVP task performance contributes significant unique variance to the prediction of WR. Specifically, consistent group main effects for the parameter of AB(minimum) were found, whereas there were no AB-specific effects (i.e., AB(width) and AB(amplitude)) except for the RD+SLI group. Finally, there was a group by measurement interaction, indicating that the RD-only and comorbid groups are differentially sensitive for prolonged testing sessions. These results suggest that more general factors involved in RSVP processing may explain the group differences found. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 70
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条