An investigation into the mechanism of the three-phase contact formation at fluorite surface by colliding bubble

被引:39
|
作者
Zawala, J. [2 ]
Drzymala, J. [1 ]
Malysa, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wroclaw Univ Technol, Min Engn Dept, PL-50370 Wroclaw, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Catalysis & Surface Chem, Krakow, Poland
关键词
Flotation; Contact angle; Fluorite; Mica; Teflon; Hydrophobicity;
D O I
10.1016/j.minpro.2008.06.006
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Mechanism of the three-phase contact (TPC) formation and phenomena occurring during collisions of the ascending bubble with a solid and flat surface were studied. Three fluorite samples of different origins and surface roughness and smooth mica plates were investigated. It was found that the time-scale and the mode of air bubble/flat fluorite surface bouncing and attachment significantly depended on the surface roughness. For smooth fluorite surfaces the time of the TPC formation and the bubble attachment was over 150 ms while for rough surfaces it was 5 to 45 ms. It was also shown that the TPC formation at fluorite and mica surfaces was determined mainly by the electrical charge of the interacting interfaces. A small amount of cationic surfactant (n-octyltrimethylammonium bromide) was used to reverse the sign of electrical charge of the bubble surface. In n-octyltrimethylammonium bromide presence there was no TPC formation at the fluorite Surface due to repulsions between positively charged interfaces, but the bubble attachment to negatively charged mica surface was observed due to attractive electrostatic interactions, It was also determined that there was no TPC formation at pHs when the signs of zeta potentials of the solution/gas and solution/fluorite interfaces were the same. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 79
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Particle-Bubble Interactions: an Investigation of the Three-Phase Contact Line by Atomic Force Microscopy
    Nicklas, Jan
    Ditscherlein, Lisa
    Peuker, Urs A.
    LANGMUIR, 2023, 39 (38) : 13630 - 13640
  • [2] Three-phase contact line profile between a large air bubble and a flat solid surface
    Mukherjee, M
    Lahiri, AK
    JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2005, 291 (02) : 593 - 596
  • [3] Three-phase contact formation between an air bubble and solid surfaces with different hydrophobicity degrees in liquid
    Kruszelnicki, Mateusz
    Kowalczuk, Przemyslaw B.
    Polowczyk, Izabela
    COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 2023, 676
  • [4] Three-phase contact expansion during the bubble adhesion on an inclined plane
    Vachova, T.
    Basarova, P.
    Brabcova, Z.
    CHISA 2012, 2012, 42 : 1897 - 1907
  • [5] On the Role of the Three-Phase Contact Line in Surface Deformation
    Leh, Aisha
    N'guessan, Hartmann E.
    Fan, Jianguo
    Bahadur, Prashant
    Tadmor, Rafael
    Zhao, Yiping
    LANGMUIR, 2012, 28 (13) : 5795 - 5801
  • [6] Wetting Behavior of a Three-Phase System in Contact with a Surface
    Mukherjee, Biswaroop
    Chakrabarti, Buddhapriya
    MACROMOLECULES, 2022, 55 (10) : 3886 - 3897
  • [7] Three-phase contact line expansion during air bubble attachment to hydrophobic solid surface - experiment and modeling
    Basarova, Pavlina
    Souskova, Katerina
    Zawala, Jan
    PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROBLEMS OF MINERAL PROCESSING, 2018, 54 (04): : 1095 - 1106
  • [8] Experimental investigation of heat transfer in three-phase contact line
    Ponomarenko, T. G.
    Fournely, C.
    ALL-RUSSIAN CONFERENCE XXXIV SIBERIAN THERMOPHYSICAL SEMINAR, DEDICATED TO THE 85TH ANNIVERSARY OF ACADEMICIAN A. K. REBROV, 2018, 1105
  • [9] Effect of dodecylamine on formation of three-phase contact line between bubbles and hydrophobic talc surface
    Jiang H.
    Luo H.-F.
    Xie J.-H.
    Han W.-P.
    Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2022, 32 (02): : 545 - 554
  • [10] Calculation of three-phase bubble columns
    Wiemann, Dierk
    Mewes, Dieter
    16TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING AND 9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2006, 21 : 239 - 247