Cost-utility analysis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis screening

被引:48
|
作者
Zhang, Eric [1 ,5 ]
Wartelle-Bladou, Claire [2 ]
Lepanto, Luigi [1 ,3 ]
Lachaine, Jean [4 ]
Cloutier, Guy [1 ,5 ]
Tang, An [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Radiol Radiooncol & Nucl Med, St Luc Hosp, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, St Luc Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, St Luc Hosp, Hlth Technol Assessment Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Fac Pharm & Pharmacoecon, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Montreal Hosp Res Ctr CRCHUM, Lab Biorheol & Med Ultrason, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); Fibrosis; Elastography; Screening; FATTY LIVER-DISEASE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATE UTILITIES; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; TRANSIENT ELASTOGRAPHY; NATURAL-HISTORY; VITAMIN-E; HEPATIC-FIBROSIS; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-015-3731-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in Western countries. No studies have examined the cost-effectiveness of screening its advanced form, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We performed a cost-utility analysis of annual noninvasive screening strategies using third-party payer perspective in a general population in comparison to screening a high-risk obese or diabetic population. Screening algorithms involved well-studied techniques, including NAFLD fibrosis score, transient elastography (TE), and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging for detecting advanced fibrosis (a parts per thousand yen F3); and plasma cytokeratin (CK)-18 for NASH detection. Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) were compared as confirmation methods. Canadian dollar (CAD or C$) costs were adjusted for inflation and discounted at 5 %. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of a parts per thousand currency signC$ 50,000 was considered cost-effective. Compared with no screening, screening with NAFLD fibrosis score/TE/CK-18 algorithm with MRE as confirmation for advanced fibrosis had an ICER of C$ 26,143 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Screening in high-risk obese or diabetic populations was more cost-effective, with an ICER of C$ 9,051 and C$ 7,991 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, respectively. Liver biopsy confirmation was not found to be cost-effective. Our model suggests that annual NASH screening in high-risk obese or diabetic populations can be cost-effective. aEuro cent This cost-utility analysis suggests that screening for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis may be cost-effective. aEuro cent In particular, screening of high-risk obese or diabetic populations is more cost-effective. aEuro cent Magnetic resonance elastography was more cost-effective to confirm disease compared to biopsy. aEuro cent More studies are needed to determine quality of life in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. aEuro cent More management strategies for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are also needed.
引用
收藏
页码:3282 / 3294
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-utility analysis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis screening
    Eric Zhang
    Claire Wartelle-Bladou
    Luigi Lepanto
    Jean Lachaine
    Guy Cloutier
    An Tang
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 3282 - 3294
  • [2] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF SCREENING STRATEGIES FOR NONALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS
    Zhang, E.
    Wartelle-Bladou, C.
    Lepanto, L.
    Lachaine, J.
    Cloutier, G.
    Tang, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A367 - A367
  • [3] Pioglitazone and Vitamin E for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Cost Utility Analysis
    Mahady, Suzanne E.
    Wong, Germaine
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    George, Jacob
    HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 56 (06) : 2172 - 2179
  • [4] Neonatal Screening: Cost-utility Analysis for Galactosemia
    Hatam, Nahid
    Askarian, Mehrdad
    Shirvani, Samad
    Siavashi, Elham
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 46 (01) : 112 - 119
  • [5] A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia
    Keller, Andrew
    Gericke, Christian
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Yaxley, John
    Kua, Boon
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 15 (01) : 95 - 111
  • [6] Comprehensive cost-utility analysis of newborn screening strategies
    Carroll, AE
    Downs, SM
    PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) : S287 - S295
  • [7] A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia
    Andrew Keller
    Christian Gericke
    Jennifer A. Whitty
    John Yaxley
    Boon Kua
    Geoff Coughlin
    Troy Gianduzzo
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2017, 15 : 95 - 111
  • [8] Cost-utility analysis
    Brown, GC
    Brown, MM
    Sharma, S
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (07) : 625 - 626
  • [9] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
    NICHOLLS, A
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 307 (6913): : 1213 - 1213
  • [10] Cost-utility analysis of screening and laser treatment of retinopathy of prematurity
    Dunbar, Jennifer A.
    Hsu, Victoria
    Christensen, Marc
    Black, Bradley
    Williams, Pamela
    Beauchamp, George
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2009, 13 (02): : 186 - 190