Assessment of heat-expanded slate and fertility requirements in green roof substrates

被引:105
|
作者
Rowe, D. Bradley [1 ]
Monterusso, Michael A.
Rugh, Clayton L.
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Hort, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
eco-roof; living roof; native species; PermaTill; plant evaluations; Sedum; succulents; vegetative roof;
D O I
10.21273/HORTTECH.16.3.0471
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Green roof technology in the United States is in the early development stage and several issues must be addressed before green roofs become more widespread in the U.S. Among these issues is the need to define growing substrates that are lightweight, permanent, and can sustain plant health without leaching nutrients that may harm the environment. High levels of substrate organic matter are not recommended because the organic matter will decompose, resulting in substrate shrinkage, and can leach nutrients such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the runoff. The same runoff problems can occur when fertilizer is applied. Also, in the midwestern U.S., there is a great deal of interest in utilizing native species and recreating natural prairies on rooftops. Since most of these native species are not succulents, it is not known if they can survive on shallow extensive green roofs without irrigation. Five planting substrate compositions containing 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% of heat-expanded slate (PermaTill) were used to evaluate the establishment, growth, and survival of two stonecrops (Sedum spp.) and six nonsucculent natives to the midwestern U.S. prairie over a period of 3 years. A second study evaluated these same plant types that were supplied with four levels of controlled-release fertilizer. Both studies were conducted at ground level in interlocking modular units (36 x 36 inches) designed for green roof applications containing 10 cm of substrate. Higher levels of heat-expanded slate in the substrate generally resulted in slightly less growth and lower visual ratings across all species. By May 2004, all plants of smooth aster (Aster laevis), horsemint (Monarda punctata), black-eyed susan (Rudbeckia hirta), and showy goldenrod (Solidago speciosa) were dead. To a lesser degree, half of the lanceleaf coreopsis (Coreopsis lanceolata) survived in 60% and 70% heat-expanded slate, but only a third of the plants survived in 80%, 90%, or 100%. Regardless of substrate composition, both 'Diffusum' stonecrop (S. middendorffianum) and 'Royal Pink' stonecrop (S. spurium) achieved 100% coverage by June 2002 and maintained this coverage into 2004. In the fertility study, plants that received low fertilizer rates generally produced the least amount of growth. However, water availability was a key factor. A greater number of smooth aster, junegrass (Koeleria macrantha), and showy goldenrod plants survived when they were not fertilized. Presumably, these plants could survive drought conditions for a longer period of time since they had less biomass to maintain. However, by the end of three growing seasons, all three nonsucculent natives also were dead. Overall results suggest that a moderately high level of heat-expanded slate (about 80%) and a relatively low level of controlled-release fertilizer (50 g(.)m(-1) per year) can be utilized for green roof applications when growing succulents such as stonecrop. However, the nonsucculents used in this study require deeper substrates, additional organic matter, or supplemental irrigation. By reducing the amount of organic matter in the substrate and by applying the minimal amount of fertilizer to maintain plant health, potential contaminated discharge of N, P, and other nutrients from green roofs is likely to be reduced considerably while still maintaining plant health.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 477
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] The suitability of crushed porcelain and foamed glass as alternatives to heat-expanded shale in green roof substrates: An assessment of plant growth, substrate moisture, and thermal regulation
    Matlock, Jason M.
    Rowe, D. Bradley
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 94 : 244 - 254
  • [2] Assessment of recycled or locally available materials as green roof substrates
    Eksi, Mert
    Sevgi, Orhan
    Akburak, Serdar
    Yurtseven, Huseyin
    Esin, Ilker
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 156
  • [3] Simulation of Heat Exchange Phenomena and Water Regime in Green Roof Substrates
    Charpentier, S.
    INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GROWING MEDIA AND COMPOSTING, 2011, 891 : 187 - 194
  • [4] Simulation of Water Regime and Sensible Heat Exchange Phenomena in Green Roof Substrates
    Charpentier, Sylvain
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2015, 14 (06): : 1 - 9
  • [5] Porous Media Characterization to Simulate Water and Heat Transport through Green Roof Substrates
    Sandoval, Victoria
    Bonilla, Carlos A.
    Gironas, Jorge
    Vera, Sergio
    Victorero, Felipe
    Bustamante, Waldo
    Rojas, Victoria
    Leiva, Eduardo
    Pasten, Pablo
    Suarez, Francisco
    VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2017, 16 (04):
  • [6] Assessment of Physical Properties and Stonecrop Growth in Green Roof Substrates Amended with Compost and Hydrogel
    Olszewski, Michael W.
    Holmes, Marion H.
    Young, Courtney A.
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 438 - 444
  • [7] Assessment of Physical Properties and Stonecrop Growth in Green Roof Substrates Amended with Compost and Hydrogel
    Olszewski, Michael W.
    Holmes, Marion H.
    Young, Courtney A.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2010, 45 (04) : 482 - 482
  • [8] A New Method to Determine How Compaction Affects Water and Heat Transport in Green Roof Substrates
    Sandoval, Victoria
    Suarez, Francisco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (21):
  • [9] Assessment of green roof thermal behavior: A coupled heat and mass transfer model
    Ouldboukhitine, Salah-Eddine
    Belarbi, Rafik
    Jaffal, Issa
    Trabelsi, Abdelkrim
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 46 (12) : 2624 - 2631
  • [10] Assessment of Temperature Reduction and Heat Budget of Extensive Modular Green Roof System
    Kim, Se-Chang
    Park, Bong-Ju
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 31 (04) : 503 - 511