Single-enantiomer drugs - Elegant science, disappointing effects

被引:44
|
作者
Mansfield, P
Henry, D
Tonkin, A
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Dept Gen Practice, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Fac Hlth, Discipline Clin Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Dept Clin & Expt Pharmacol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00003088-200443050-00002
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Most new drugs are marketed as single enantiomers but many older agents are still available in racemic form. As these drugs reach the end of their patent life manufacturers become interested in marketing single enantiomer equivalents. This is called 'chiral switching' and it has been claimed that it will bring clinical benefits in terms of improved efficacy, more predictable pharmacokinetics or reduced toxicity. We reviewed the clinical evidence and prices for three recently marketed single enantiomer versions of widely used racemic drugs: escitalopram, esomeprazole and levosalbutamol. Claims of increased efficacy were based on comparisons of non-equivalent doses and any advantages seemed small and clinically unimportant. Prices of esomeprazole and levosalbutamol were higher than their racemic alternatives and we predict that these prices will remain high despite the market presence of generic versions of the racemates. Patent protection and a perception of superiority based on promotion rather than evidence will maintian price premiums for single enantiomer drugs that are not justified on the basis of clinical performance.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 290
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single-Enantiomer DrugsElegant Science, Disappointing Effects
    Peter Mansfield
    David Henry
    Anne Tonkin
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2004, 43 : 287 - 290
  • [2] Single-enantiomer drugs poised for further market growth
    Erb, Sandra
    Pharmaceutical Technology, 2006, 30 (SUPPL.)
  • [3] Medicare Part D Spending on Single-Enantiomer Drugs Versus Their Racemic Precursors
    Egilman, Alexander C.
    Zhang, Audrey D.
    Wallach, Joshua D.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 171 (07) : 521 - +
  • [4] Assessing the Chiral Switch: Approval and Use of Single-Enantiomer Drugs, 2001 to 2011
    Gellad, Walid F.
    Choi, Phillip
    Mizah, Margaret
    Good, Chester B.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2014, 20 (03): : E90 - E97
  • [5] Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors A Systematic Review
    Long, Aaron S.
    Zhang, Audrey D.
    Meyer, Caitlin E.
    Egilman, Alexander C.
    Ross, Joseph S.
    Wallach, Joshua D.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (05)
  • [6] Synthesis of Single-enantiomer Bioactive Molecules: A Brief Overview
    Rouf, Abdul
    Taneja, S. C.
    CHIRALITY, 2014, 26 (02) : 63 - 78
  • [8] Stereoselective Crystallization as a Basis for Single-Enantiomer Drug Production
    Bredikhin, Alexander A.
    Bredikhina, Zemfira A.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 40 (07) : 1211 - 1220
  • [9] Dehalogenation of alkyl halides catalyzed by single-enantiomer complexes of titanium
    Abbie R. Abbott
    Jason Thompson
    Lawrence C. Thompson
    Kyle S. Knight
    Transition Metal Chemistry, 2003, 28 : 305 - 307
  • [10] Microreaction and membrane technologies for continuous single-enantiomer production: A review
    Petrusova, Zuzana
    Slouka, Zdenek
    Vobecka, Lucie
    Polezhaev, Petr
    Hasal, Pavel
    Pribyl, Michal
    Izak, Pavel
    CATALYSIS REVIEWS-SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 65 (03): : 773 - 821