Coupled 3-D numerical simulation of proppant distribution and hydraulic fracturing performance optimization in Marcellus shale reservoirs

被引:33
|
作者
Kong, B. [1 ]
Fathi, E. [1 ]
Ameni, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
关键词
Marcellus shale reservoirs; Hydraulic fracturing; Proppant distribution; Numerical reservoir simulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.coal.2015.06.006
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Effective hydraulic fracturing stimulation is highly reliant on the flow area and proppant pack permeability of the induced hydraulic fractures. The flow area is largely determined by proppant distribution while fracture permeability is mainly governed by proppant sizes. To create a fracture with a large flow area, small proppants are essential to maintain a minimum proppant settling velocity; on the other hand, large proppant sizes provide higher proppant pack permeability. Therefore, an optimum operational procedure, i.e., scheduling of injection rate, proppant size and volume, is required to achieve maximum well productivity index. This, however, requires both field experiments (e.g., small volume pre-job tests) and an advanced numerical simulator that couples solid and fluid transport with fracture propagation model including mass exchange between reservoir matrix and hydraulic fracture, i.e., leak-off rate. In this study, we focused on developing new modules for our in-house 3-D numerical simulator where proppant transport and reservoir performance optimization is considered. In new module Navier-Stokes equation describing fluid flow in the fracture and leak-off in the formation is coupled with mass conservation equation governing the proppant transport, and solved using finite difference approach. Fracture propagation is also one-way coupled with proppant transport and fluid flow using in-house 3D hydraulic fracturing simulator "HFWVU". During the simulation Proppant slippage velocity is considered over wide range of hydraulic fracturing propagation regimes, i.e., toughness-dominated to viscosity-dominated cases, with small and large leak-offs. The simulation results predict that reservoir matrix permeability highly impacts the proppant size selection and pumping scheduling to achieve the optimum reservoir stimulation performance. Ignoring the fluid-solid interaction, i.e., proppant settling velocity, in hydraulic fracturing simulation leads to overestimating the efficiency of the process in wide range of operation conditions. It has also been predicted that the optimum combination of proppant size and their volume portion exists for specific reservoir and treatment conditions that can optimize fracture performance. Uncertainty analysis of the reservoir behavior using experimental design technique shows that hydraulic fracturing efficiency on production performance can be highly influenced by reservoir matrix permeability, i.e., uncontrollable variable. This implies that the same hydraulic fracturing procedure applied in conventional reservoirs might not be as efficient in unconventional reservoir and special attention to reservoir characteristics needs to be made while designing the hydraulic fracturing procedure. Followed by reservoir matrix permeability, proppant volume and relative proppant/fluid density have the highest impact on hydraulic fracturing efficiency. This study couples hydraulic fracturing simulation with reservoir simulation and is a unique approach for the further understanding of proppant transport and settling, fracture geometry variation and fracture production performance. It also provides foundation for the development of sound numerical models for hydraulic fracturing design. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 45
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical Simulation of Hydraulic Fracturing and Penetration Law in Continental Shale Reservoirs
    Zhao, Yanxin
    Wang, Lei
    Ma, Kuo
    Zhang, Feng
    PROCESSES, 2022, 10 (11)
  • [2] 3-D numerical simulation of hydraulic fracturing in a CBM reservoir
    Zou, Junpeng
    Chen, Weizhong
    Yuan, Jingqiang
    Yang, Diansen
    Yang, Jianping
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 37 : 386 - 396
  • [3] A method for 3-D hydraulic fracturing simulation
    Secchi, S.
    Schrefler, B. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2012, 178 (1-2) : 245 - 258
  • [4] A method for 3-D hydraulic fracturing simulation
    S. Secchi
    B. A. Schrefler
    International Journal of Fracture, 2012, 178 : 245 - 258
  • [5] Numerical Simulation of Proppant Transport Coupled with Multi-Planar-3D Hydraulic Fracture Propagation for Multi-Cluster Fracturing
    Ming Chen
    Tiankui Guo
    Yushi Zou
    Shicheng Zhang
    Zhanqing Qu
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55 : 565 - 590
  • [6] Numerical Simulation of Proppant Transport Coupled with Multi-Planar-3D Hydraulic Fracture Propagation for Multi-Cluster Fracturing
    Chen, Ming
    Guo, Tiankui
    Zou, Yushi
    Zhang, Shicheng
    Qu, Zhanqing
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2022, 55 (02) : 565 - 590
  • [7] Numerical simulation of formation water salinity redistribution in fractured shale reservoirs during hydraulic fracturing
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhao, Chaoneng
    Zhou, Wengao
    Yu, Heng
    Zhao, Jinzhou
    Hu, Yongquan
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 218
  • [8] Numerical simulation of fracture reorientation during hydraulic fracturing in perforated horizontal well in shale reservoirs
    Li, Qingchao
    Li, Yudi
    Cheng, Yuanfang
    Li, Qiang
    Wang, Fuling
    Wei, Jia
    Liu, YuWen
    Zhang, Chuang
    Song, Benjian
    Yan, Chuanliang
    Ansari, Ubedullah
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2018, 40 (15) : 1807 - 1813
  • [9] Simulation and optimization of hydraulic fracturing in shale reservoirs: A case study in the Permian Lucaogou formation, China
    Lu, Chunhua
    Jiang, Hanqiao
    Yang, Jinlong
    Yang, Haitong
    Cheng, Baoyang
    Zhang, Miao
    He, Jixiang
    Li, Junjian
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 2558 - 2573
  • [10] Numerical simulation of 3D hydraulic fracturing process
    Li, Gen
    Tang, Chun-An
    Li, Lian-Chong
    Liang, Zheng-Zhao
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32 (12): : 1875 - 1881