Search, reuse and sharing of research data in materials science and engineering-A qualitative interview study

被引:17
|
作者
Suhr, Bettina [1 ]
Dungl, Johanna [1 ]
Stocker, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Virtual Vehicle Res GmbH, Graz, Austria
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 09期
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0239216
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Open research data practices are a relatively new, thus still evolving part of scientific work, and their usage varies strongly within different scientific domains. In the literature, the investigation of open research data practices covers the whole range of big empirical studies covering multiple scientific domains to smaller, in depth studies analysing a single field of research. Despite the richness of literature on this topic, there is still a lack of knowledge on the (open) research data awareness and practices in materials science and engineering. While most current studies focus only on some aspects of open research data practices, we aim for a comprehensive understanding of all practices with respect to the considered scientific domain. Hence this study aims at 1) drawing the whole picture of search, reuse and sharing of research data 2) while focusing on materials science and engineering. The chosen approach allows to explore the connections between different aspects of open research data practices, e.g. between data sharing and data search. In depth interviews with 13 researchers in this field were conducted, transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using content analysis. The main findings characterised research data in materials science and engineering as extremely diverse, often generated for a very specific research focus and needing a precise description of the data and the complete generation process for possible reuse. Results on research data search and reuse showed that the interviewees intended to reuse data but were mostly unfamiliar with (yet interested in) modern methods as dataset search engines, data journals or searching public repositories. Current research data sharing is not open, but bilaterally and usually encouraged by supervisors or employers. Project funding does affect data sharing in two ways: some researchers argue to share their data openly due to their funding agency's policy, while others face legal restrictions for sharing as their projects are partly funded by industry. The time needed for a precise description of the data and their generation process is named as biggest obstacle for data sharing. From these findings, a precise set of actions is derived suitable to support Open Data, involving training for researchers and introducing rewards for data sharing on the level of universities and funding bodies.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sharing Qualitative Interview Data in Dialogue with Research Participants
    Kvale L.H.
    Pharo N.
    Darch P.
    Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2023, 60 (01) : 223 - 232
  • [2] Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data
    Bishop, Libby
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 2009, 44 (03) : 255 - 272
  • [3] German funders' data sharing policies-A qualitative interview study
    Anger, Michael
    Wendelborn, Christian
    Schickhardt, Christoph
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [4] Open qualitative data: a worked example of qualitative data sharing from an interview study on loneliness in young adulthood
    Creaven, Ann-Marie
    Kirwan, Emma M.
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 22 (02) : 457 - 481
  • [5] Sharing Data and Materials in Psychological Science
    Lindsay, D. Stephen
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 28 (06) : 699 - 702
  • [7] Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science
    Steven M. Alexander
    Kristal Jones
    Nathan J. Bennett
    Amber Budden
    Michael Cox
    Mercè Crosas
    Edward T. Game
    Janis Geary
    R. Dean Hardy
    Jay T. Johnson
    Sebastian Karcher
    Nicole Motzer
    Jeremy Pittman
    Heather Randell
    Julie A. Silva
    Patricia Pinto da Silva
    Carly Strasser
    Colleen Strawhacker
    Andrew Stuhl
    Nic Weber
    Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3 : 81 - 88
  • [8] Qualitative data sharing and synthesis for sustainability science
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Jones, Kristal
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Budden, Amber
    Cox, Michael
    Crosas, Merce
    Game, Edward T.
    Geary, Janis
    Hardy, R. Dean
    Johnson, Jay T.
    Karcher, Sebastian
    Motzer, Nicole
    Pittman, Jeremy
    Randell, Heather
    Silva, Julie A.
    Da Silva, Patricia Pinto
    Strasser, Carly
    Strawhacker, Colleen
    Stuhl, Andrew
    Weber, Nic
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3 (02) : 81 - 88
  • [9] The time efficiency gain in sharing and reuse of research data
    Pronk T.E.
    Data Science Journal, 2019, 18 (01):
  • [10] Information Scientists' Motivations for Research Data Sharing and Reuse
    Shutsko, Aliaksandra
    Stock, Wolfgang G.
    LIBRI-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIBRARIES AND INFORMATION STUDIES, 2023, 73 (04): : 307 - 320