Global water footprint assessment of hydropower

被引:97
|
作者
Scherer, Laura [1 ]
Pfister, Stephan [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Renewable energy; Water scarcity; Environmental flow requirements; Life cycle assessment; RIVER; ELECTRICITY; CONSEQUENCES; BIODIVERSITY; RESERVOIRS; IMPACTS; ENERGY; DAMS; ECOSYSTEM; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2016.07.021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydropower is an important renewable energy source, but it can consume a lot of water due to evaporation from the reservoir surface, which may contribute to water scarcity. Previous studies mostly used a gross evaporation approach for water footprint assessment where all the evaporation is attributed to hydropower. They fail to consider both evapotranspiration before the dam construction, which should be deducted from the footprint, and the seasonal storage dynamics of water. These considerations are critical for assessing reservoir impacts on water scarcity using temporally explicit water stress indices. This study seeks to fill this gap: we calculate the water footprints of 1500 hydropower plants which cover 43% of the global annual hydroelectricity generation. Apart from reduced water availability, alterations of the flow regime can also adversely affect ecosystems. Therefore, environmental flow requirements are also analysed. This novel approach for the water footprint assessment of hydropower indicates that previous studies mostly overrated the impacts of hydropower on water scarcity, often because reservoirs store water in periods of low scarcity and release water during months of high water scarcity. By contrast, flow alterations generally affect the environment more than water consumption. Since impacts vary broadly among plants, plant-specific evaluations are necessary. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 720
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water scarcity footprint of hydropower based on a seasonal approach - Global assessment with sensitivities of model assumptions tested on specific cases
    Pfister, Stephan
    Scherer, Laura
    Buxmann, Kurt
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 724
  • [2] The consumptive water footprint of electricity and heat: a global assessment
    Mekonnen, Mesfin M.
    Gerbens-Leenes, P. W.
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 1 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [3] A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products
    Mekonnen, Mesfin M.
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (03) : 401 - 415
  • [4] A Global Assessment of the Water Footprint of Farm Animal Products
    Mesfin M. Mekonnen
    Arjen Y. Hoekstra
    Ecosystems, 2012, 15 : 401 - 415
  • [5] The blue water footprint of electricity from hydropower
    Mekonnen, M. M.
    Hoekstra, A. Y.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (01) : 179 - 187
  • [6] Water footprint benchmarks for crop production: A first global assessment
    Mekonnen, Mesfin M.
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 46 : 214 - 223
  • [7] Evolution of China's water footprint and virtual water trade: A global trade assessment
    Tian, Xu
    Sarkis, Joseph
    Geng, Yong
    Qian, Yiying
    Gao, Cuixia
    Bleischwitz, Raimund
    Xu, Yue
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 : 178 - 188
  • [8] Integrated assessment of the net carbon footprint of small hydropower plants
    Gomez-Gener, Lluis
    Gubau, Marina
    von Schiller, Daniel
    Marce, Rafael
    Obrador, Biel
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (08)
  • [9] Assessing the water and carbon footprint of hydropower stations at a national scale
    Wang, Jinyan
    Chen, Xiuzhi
    Liu, Zhongwei
    Frans, Veronica F.
    Xu, Zhenci
    Qiu, Xinjiao
    Xu, Feipeng
    Li, Yunkai
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 676 : 595 - 612
  • [10] Water Footprint Symposium: where next for water footprint and water assessment methodology?
    Martin R. Tillotson
    Junguo Liu
    Dabo Guan
    Pute Wu
    Xu Zhao
    Guoping Zhang
    Stephan Pfister
    Markus Pahlow
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2014, 19 (8) : 1561 - 1565