共 4 条
A validation study of 3 grading systems to evaluate small-bowel cleansing for wireless capsule endoscopy: a quantitative index, a qualitative evaluation, and an overall adequacy assessment
被引:86
|作者:
Brotz, Corey
[1
]
Nandi, Neilanjan
[2
]
Conn, Mitchell
[1
]
Daskalakis, Constantine
[3
]
DiMarino, Michael
[1
]
Infantolino, Anthony
[1
]
Katz, Leo C.
[1
]
Schroeder, Theodore
[4
]
Kastenberg, David
机构:
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Dept Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词:
TRANSIT-TIME;
COLONOSCOPY;
SIMETHICONE;
INDICATORS;
IMPACT;
YIELD;
D O I:
10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.016
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a powerful tool for evaluating the small bowel. Assessment of small-bowel cleansing for CE is an essential quality measure. Objective: Our purpose was to validate 3 new scales that grade small-bowel cleansing for CE. Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center study. Setting: Tertiary university hospital. Intervention: Five experienced capsule endoscopists read 40 CEs twice, separated by I month, to grade small-bowel cleansing on 3 scales-quantitative index (QI; 0-10), qualitative evaluation (QE; poor, fair, good, excellent), and overall adequacy assessment (OAA; inadequate, adequate). The QI and QE evaluated both the entire and distal small bowel. Investigators received no prior training in these scales. Main Outcome Measurements: Intraclass correlation coefficients to assess intraobserver (test-retest) and interobserver reliability. Patients: Forty patients who underwent I CE between June 2005 and May 2006 and who satisfied entry criteria. Results: Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial for the QI (0.60-0.66), moderate for the OAA (0.56), and fair to moderate for the QE (0.37-0.47). Interobserver scores were lower QI and OAA moderate (0.47-0-52, 0.41, respectively) and slight to fair for the QE (0.20-0.24). QI scores for the entire and distal small bowel were highly correlated for each reader (0.57-0.87), and distal small-bowel scores were lower by 1.3 points, indicating poorer cleansing (P = .001). A dichotomized QE of excellent/good versus fair/poor had moderate to Substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability (0.58-0.66, 0.41-0.49, respectively). There was a strong and highly significant association among all 3 scales (P < .001 between QI and both QE and OAA). Conclusion: We have described and validated 3 scales for grading small-bowel cleansing for CE. An evaluation of small-bowel cleansing should be routinely incorporated into the CE report. (Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:262-70.)
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 270
页数:9
相关论文