Group housing for lactating sows with electronically controlled crates: 1. Reproductive traits, body condition, and feed intake

被引:10
|
作者
Bohnenkamp, A. -L. [1 ]
Traulsen, I. [1 ]
Meyer, C. [2 ]
Mueller, K. [2 ]
Krieter, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kiel, Inst Anim Breeding & Husb, D-24098 Kiel, Germany
[2] Chamber Agr Schleswig Holstein, D-24327 Blekendorf, Germany
关键词
farrowing; group housing system; mortality; reproduction; sow; PIGLET MORTALITY; BEHAVIOR; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; LITTERS; YIELD; TIME;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2012-5255
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim was to compare a group housing system (GROUP) and a conventional single housing (SINGLE) for lactating sows with regard to the performance of sows and piglets. Data of 132 cross-breed sows were collected in 11 batches with 6 sows in GROUP and SINGLE in each batch. The GROUP had single pens (4.7 m(2)) with electronically controlled crates and a shared running area (13 m(2)). The sows in GROUP were retained in the crates 3 d prepartum until 1 d postpartum. Piglets were able to leave the single pens on d 5 postpartum. Recorded traits per litter included the number of piglets born alive and weaned, piglet losses, and individual BW at birth and weaning. In addition, body condition and back fat thickness before and after lactation (26 d) and the daily feed intake of the sows were measured. Gilts and sows were analyzed separately. The reproductive traits did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) between the farrowing systems with exception of the weaning weights (GROUP = 7.6 +/- 0.12 kg vs. SINGLE = 8.1 +/- 0.12 kg; P < 0.05). Group housed and SINGLE sows had 14.4 +/- 0.47 and 14.6 +/- 0.45 piglets born alive, respectively. In both housing systems, sows weaned 11.4 piglets (SEM = 0.14 and 0.13 for GROUP and SINGLE), respectively. Most piglet losses (72%) occurred during the first 3 d postpartum. At this point in time, piglets in GROUP and SINGLE were housed in single pens. In the single pens, GROUP sows could leave the farrowing crate whereas SINGLE sows were fixed in crates during the whole lactation. In total, piglet losses were not significantly different during lactation between GROUP and SINGLE treatments (2.2 +/- 0.05 and 2.4 +/- 0.05 piglets per litter, respectively). Sows housed in GROUP had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) BCS (2.2 +/- 0.05) after lactation compared with SINGLE sows (BCS = 2.4 +/- 0.05). This development could not be verified using the back fat thickness value at weaning (GROUP = 14.4 +/- 0.25 mm vs. SINGLE = 14.6 +/- 0.23 mm). Daily feed intake was significantly greater for GROUP sows (6.4 +/- 0.08 kg per day) than SINGLE sows (6.15 +/- 0.08 kg per day; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the performance of GROUP and SINGLE sows was similar with the exception of lighter weaning weights in GROUP housing.
引用
收藏
页码:3413 / 3419
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Group housing for lactating sows with electronically controlled crates: performance and behavioral parameters of sows and piglets
    Bohnenkamp, Anna-Lena
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2013, 85 (05): : 413 - 413
  • [2] Group housing for lactating sows with electronically controlled crates: Effect performance, behavior, space and labor requirement
    Bohnenkamp, Anna-Lena
    Meyer, C.
    Mueller, Karin
    Krieter, J.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2013, 85 (05): : 367 - 375
  • [3] Group housing with electronically controlled crates for lactating sows. Effect on farrowing, suckling and activity behavior of sows and piglets
    Bohnenkamp, Anna-Lena
    Meyer, Christian
    Mueller, Karin
    Krieter, Joachim
    APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2013, 145 (1-2) : 37 - 43
  • [4] Effect of intelligent feeder on feed intake, body condition and production performance of lactating sows
    Wang M.
    An T.
    Liu J.
    Zhang J.
    Wang W.
    Yi L.
    Tian J.
    Wu Z.
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35 (06): : 190 - 197
  • [5] EFFECTS OF INTEGRATED GROUP HOUSING OF SOWS ON BEHAVIOR, GENERAL HEALTH, AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS .1. BEHAVIOR
    GERTKEN, G
    KRIETER, J
    SCHLICHTING, M
    ERNST, E
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1993, 65 (03): : 180 - 187
  • [6] Investigations about group-housing of pregnant sows with special regard to the influence of offering straw on reproductive traits .1. Performance and constitution of the sows
    SchaferMuller, K
    Reinsch, N
    Hartwigsen, R
    Ernst, E
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1997, 69 (01): : 54 - 61
  • [7] Body development in sows, feed intake and maternal capacity. Part 1: performance, pre-breeding and lactation feed intake traits of primiparous sows
    Lewis, C. R. G.
    Bunter, K. L.
    ANIMAL, 2011, 5 (12) : 1843 - 1854
  • [8] Body development in sows, feed intake and maternal capacity. Part 2: gilt body condition before and after lactation, reproductive performance and correlations with lactation feed intake
    Lewis, C. R. G.
    Bunter, K. L.
    ANIMAL, 2011, 5 (12) : 1855 - 1867
  • [9] Influence of feed intake during pregnancy and lactation on fat body reserve mobilisation, plasma leptin and reproductive function of primiparous lactating sows
    Prunier, A
    Guadarrama, CAM
    Mourot, J
    Quesnel, H
    REPRODUCTION NUTRITION DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 41 (04): : 333 - 347
  • [10] Effect of gestating sow body condition, feed refusals, and group housing on growth and feed intake in grower-finishing pigs
    Sell-Kubiak, E.
    van der Waaij, E. H.
    Bijma, P.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (08) : 3538 - 3548