Human rather than ape-like orbital morphology allows much greater lateral visual field expansion with eye abduction

While convergent, the human orbit differs from that of non-human apes in that its lateral orbital margin is significantly more rearward. This rearward position does not obstruct the additional visual field gained through eye motion. This additional visual field is therefore considered to be wider in humans than in non-human apes. A mathematical model was designed to quantify this difference. The mathematical model is based on published computed tomography data in the human neuroocular plane (NOP) and on additional anatomical data from 100 human skulls and 120 non-human ape skulls (30 gibbons; 30 chimpanzees / bonobos; 30 orangutans; 30 gorillas). It is used to calculate temporal visual field eccentricity values in the NOP first in the primary position of gaze then for any eyeball rotation value in abduction up to 45 degrees and any lateral orbital margin position between 85 degrees and 115 degrees relative to the sagittal plane. By varying the lateral orbital margin position, the human orbit can be made "non-human ape-like". In the Pan-like orbit, the orbital margin position (98.7 degrees) was closest to the human orbit (107.1 degrees). This modest 8.4 degrees difference resulted in a large 21.1 degrees difference in maximum lateral visual field eccentricity with eyeball abduction (Pan-like: 115 degrees; human: 136.1 degrees).