Impact of Timing and Dose of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy in a Preclinical Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction

被引:43
|
作者
Richardson, James D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bertaso, Angela G. [1 ,2 ]
Psaltis, Peter J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Frost, Lachlan [1 ,2 ]
Carbone, Angelo [1 ,2 ]
Paton, Sharon [3 ]
Nelson, Adam J. [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Dennis T. L. [1 ,2 ]
Worthley, Matthew I. [1 ,2 ]
Gronthos, Stan [3 ]
Zannettino, Andrew C. W. [3 ]
Worthley, Stephen G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hosp, Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Dept Med, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med Sci, Ctr Stem Cell Res, Robinson Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Cardiovasc Dis, Rochester, MN USA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Mesenchymal stem cells; timing; repair; myocardial infarction; cardiac magnetic resonance; prospective isolation; hypoxic conditioning; optimisation; LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; STEM-CELLS; HEART FUNCTION; TRANSPLANTATION; REPAIR; EXPRESSION; HYPOXIA; METAANALYSIS; STATEMENT; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.03.011
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC) have shown therapeutic promise after myocardial infarction (MI), the impact of cell dose and timing of intervention remains uncertain. We compared immediate and deferred administration of 2 doses of MSC in a rat model of MI. Methods and Results: Sprague-Dawley rats were used. Allogeneic prospectively isolated MSC ("low" dose 1 x 10(6) or "high" dose 2 x 10(6) cells) were delivered by transepicardial injection immediately after MI ("early-low," "early-high"), or 1 week later ("late-low," "late-high"). Control subjects received cryopreservant solution alone. Left ventricular dimensions and ejection fraction (EF) were assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance. All 4 MSC-treatment cohorts demonstrated higher EF than control animals 4 weeks after MI (P values <.01 to <.0001), with function most preserved in the early-high group (absolute reduction in EF from baseline: control 39.1 +/- 1.7%, early-low 26.5 +/- 3.2%, early-high 7.9 +/- 2.6%, late-low 19.6 +/- 3.5%, late-high 17.9 +/- 4.0%). Cell treatment also attenuated left ventricular dilatation and fibrosis and augmented left ventricular mass, systolic wall thickening (SWT), and microvascular density. Although early intervention selectively increased SWT and vascular density in the infarct territory, delayed treatment caused greater benefit in remote (noninfarct) myocardium. All outcomes demonstrated dose dependence for early MSC treatment, but not for later cell administration. Conclusions: The nature and magnitude of benefit from MSC after acute MI is strongly influenced by timing of cell delivery, with dose dependence most evident for early intervention. These novel insights have potential implications for cell therapy after MI in human patients.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 353
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in preclinical models of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review protocol
    Barron, Carly C.
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Stewart, Duncan J.
    Fergusson, Dean
    Yang, Homer
    Moher, David
    Liu, Peter
    Mazer, David
    Devereaux, P. J.
    McIntyre, Lauralyn
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [2] Assessment of safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in preclinical models of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review protocol
    Carly C. Barron
    Manoj M. Lalu
    Duncan J. Stewart
    Dean Fergusson
    Homer Yang
    David Moher
    Peter Liu
    David Mazer
    P. J. Devereaux
    Lauralyn McIntyre
    Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [3] Optimization of timing and multiple infusions of atorvastatin-pretreated mesenchymal stem cells therapy in a preclinical model of acute myocardial infarction
    Xu, J.
    Yang, Y. J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 : 537 - 537
  • [4] MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS FORIMPROVEMENT OF CARDIAC FUNCTIONFOLLOWING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A MATTER OF TIMING
    Barrere-Lemaire, Stephanie
    Vincent, Anne
    Jorgensen, Christian
    Piot, Christophe
    Nargeot, Joel
    Djouad, Farida
    PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2024, 104 (02) : 659 - 725
  • [5] Optimization of Timing and Times for Administration of Atorvastatin-Pretreated Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Preclinical Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Xu, Jun
    Xiong, Yu-Yan
    Li, Qing
    Hu, Meng-tin
    Huang, Pei-Sen
    Xu, Jun-Yan
    Tian, Xia-Qiu
    Jin, Chen
    Liu, Jian-Dong
    Qian, Li
    Yang, Yue-Jin
    STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (10) : 1068 - 1083
  • [6] Rational transplant timing and dose of mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zi Wang
    Lingling Wang
    Xuan Su
    Jun Pu
    Meng Jiang
    Ben He
    Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 8
  • [7] Rational transplant timing and dose of mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Zi
    Wang, Lingling
    Su, Xuan
    Pu, Jun
    Jiang, Meng
    He, Ben
    STEM CELL RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2017, 8 : 1 - 10
  • [8] Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy For Acute Lung Injury In Preclinical Animal Models: A Systematic Review
    Sullivan, K. J.
    McIntyre, L. A.
    Moher, D.
    Fergusson, D.
    Mei, S. H. J.
    Lalu, M. M.
    Marshall, J. C.
    Mcleod, M.
    Griffin, G.
    Grimshaw, J.
    Turgeon, A.
    Avey, M.
    Fishman, J.
    Christou, G.
    Stewart, D. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 191
  • [9] Cytoprotective Actions of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy After Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Mazhari, Ramesh
    Boyle, Andrew
    Hatzistergos, Konstantinos
    Quevedo, Henry
    Oskouei, Behzad
    Hu, Qinghua
    Zambrano, Juan
    Zimmet, Jeffrey
    Wu, Vivien
    Fu, Sidney
    McCaffrey, Timothy
    Heldman, Alan
    Hare, Joshua
    CIRCULATION, 2009, 120 (18) : S820 - S820
  • [10] Cell therapy for acute myocardial infarction
    Wollert, Kai C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 8 (02) : 202 - 210